Ad is loading...
BUSE
Price
$26.47
Change
-$0.24 (-0.90%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
72 days until earnings call
CFB
Price
$17.13
Change
-$0.14 (-0.81%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
71 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BUSE vs CFB

Header iconBUSE vs CFB Comparison
Open Charts BUSE vs CFBBanner chart's image
First Busey
Price$26.47
Change-$0.24 (-0.90%)
Volume$215.09K
CapitalizationN/A
CrossFirst Bankshares
Price$17.13
Change-$0.14 (-0.81%)
Volume$195.99K
CapitalizationN/A
BUSE vs CFB Comparison Chart
Loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
CFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. CFB commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a Sell and CFB is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BUSE: $26.47 vs. CFB: $17.13)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and CFB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 76% vs. CFB: 72%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $1.33B vs. CFB: $684.05M
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.33B. CFB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $684.05M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.81B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCFB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CFB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BUSE and CFB are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CFB’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • CFB’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CFB is a better buy in the short-term than BUSE.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.15% price change this week, while CFB (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.40%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

CFB is expected to report earnings on Jan 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.40% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUSE($1.33B) has a higher market cap than CFB($684M). BUSE has higher P/E ratio than CFB: BUSE (10.79) vs CFB (10.12). CFB YTD gains are higher at: 26.141 vs. BUSE (10.940). CFB has less debt than BUSE: CFB (86.8M) vs BUSE (336M). BUSE has higher revenues than CFB: BUSE (442M) vs CFB (245M).
BUSECFBBUSE / CFB
Capitalization1.33B684M194%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD10.94026.14142%
P/E Ratio10.7910.12107%
Revenue442M245M180%
Total Cash142MN/A-
Total Debt336M86.8M387%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
67
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
57
SMR RATING
1..100
16
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
47
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
25
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
37

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSECFB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
58%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
CFB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CSUZX24.810.19
+0.77%
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
GURAX33.790.06
+0.18%
NAA Risk Managed Real Estate A
MXCAX11.40-0.03
-0.26%
BlackRock Emerging Markets Ex-Chn Inv A
TAMVX36.84-0.19
-0.51%
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Adv
SHGTX79.12-1.12
-1.40%
Columbia Seligman Global Tech A

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
-0.90%
FFBC - BUSE
91%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
NWBI - BUSE
90%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
UBSI - BUSE
90%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
TOWN - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
WSBC - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
More

CFB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CFB has been closely correlated with BUSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CFB jumps, then BUSE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CFB
1D Price
Change %
CFB100%
-0.81%
BUSE - CFB
87%
Closely correlated
-0.90%
FFBC - CFB
85%
Closely correlated
+0.07%
UBSI - CFB
85%
Closely correlated
-0.19%
NWBI - CFB
84%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
BY - CFB
84%
Closely correlated
-0.99%
More