BUSE
Price
$24.25
Change
-$0.66 (-2.65%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
1.33B
66 days until earnings call
FBMS
Price
$36.06
Change
-$0.60 (-1.64%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
796.94M
60 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BUSE vs FBMS

Header iconBUSE vs FBMS Comparison
Open Charts BUSE vs FBMSBanner chart's image
First Busey
Price$24.25
Change-$0.66 (-2.65%)
Volume$376.43K
Capitalization1.33B
First Bancshares
Price$36.06
Change-$0.60 (-1.64%)
Volume$158.63K
Capitalization796.94M
BUSE vs FBMS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. FBMS commentary
Feb 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a Hold and FBMS is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 22, 2025
Stock price -- (BUSE: $24.91 vs. FBMS: $36.66)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and FBMS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 115% vs. FBMS: 112%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $1.33B vs. FBMS: $796.94M
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $1.33B. FBMS’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $796.94M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFBMS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FBMS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BUSE and FBMS are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FBMS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FBMS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the short-term than FBMS.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.56% price change this week, while FBMS (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.95%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.97%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Apr 29, 2025.

FBMS is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.95% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUSE($1.33B) has a higher market cap than FBMS($797M). BUSE (10.79) and FBMS (10.68) have similar P/E ratio . BUSE YTD gains are higher at: 6.842 vs. FBMS (5.433). BUSE has more cash in the bank: 142M vs. FBMS (122M). FBMS has less debt than BUSE: FBMS (132M) vs BUSE (336M). BUSE has higher revenues than FBMS: BUSE (442M) vs FBMS (290M).
BUSEFBMSBUSE / FBMS
Capitalization1.33B797M167%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD6.8425.433126%
P/E Ratio10.7910.68101%
Revenue442M290M152%
Total Cash142M122M116%
Total Debt336M132M255%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs FBMS: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
FBMS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1672
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
49
Fair valued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6761
SMR RATING
1..100
1518
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5344
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3517
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUSE's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBMS (73) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to FBMS’s over the last 12 months.

FBMS's Profit vs Risk Rating (61) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (67) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBMS’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FBMS (18) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to FBMS’s over the last 12 months.

FBMS's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBMS’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

FBMS's P/E Growth Rating (17) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (35) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FBMS’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSEFBMS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BUSE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FBMS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MRSJX23.72N/A
N/A
MFS Research International R4
WEMAX10.31N/A
N/A
Allspring Emerging Growth A
PSCNX16.55N/A
N/A
Penn Capital Special Sits Sm Cp Eq Inst
OAIEX13.74N/A
N/A
Optimum International A
CMVYX13.98N/A
N/A
Columbia Select Mid Cap Value Instl 3

BUSE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUSE has been closely correlated with FFBC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 89% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUSE jumps, then FFBC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BUSE
1D Price
Change %
BUSE100%
+0.12%
FFBC - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
-1.36%
CFB - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
+0.30%
NWBI - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
WSBC - BUSE
89%
Closely correlated
-1.09%
FMBH - BUSE
88%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
More

FBMS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FBMS has been closely correlated with HFWA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FBMS jumps, then HFWA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FBMS
1D Price
Change %
FBMS100%
-0.76%
HFWA - FBMS
83%
Closely correlated
-0.49%
NWBI - FBMS
83%
Closely correlated
-0.86%
TRST - FBMS
83%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
FMBH - FBMS
83%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
BUSE - FBMS
83%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
More