BUSE
Price
$30.32
Change
+$0.17 (+0.56%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
2.5B
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
LKFN
Price
$59.70
Change
+$0.07 (+0.12%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
1.48B
38 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BUSE vs LKFN

BUSE vs LKFN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BUSE vs. LKFN commentary
Sep 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUSE is a Hold and LKFN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BUSE($2.5B) has a higher market cap than LKFN($1.48B). LKFN has higher P/E ratio than BUSE: LKFN (13.69) vs BUSE (12.38). BUSE YTD gains are higher at: 31.179 vs. LKFN (7.364). BUSE has more cash in the bank: 169M vs. LKFN (65.7M). LKFN has less debt than BUSE: LKFN (71.2M) vs BUSE (286M). BUSE has higher revenues than LKFN: BUSE (790M) vs LKFN (279M).
BUSELKFNBUSE / LKFN
Capitalization2.5B1.48B169%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD31.1797.364423%
P/E Ratio12.3813.6990%
Revenue790M279M283%
Total Cash169M65.7M257%
Total Debt286M71.2M402%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BUSE vs LKFN: Fundamental Ratings
BUSE
LKFN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
26
Undervalued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4295
SMR RATING
1..100
1524
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4352
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8571
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BUSE's Valuation (26) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKFN (69). This means that BUSE’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKFN’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LKFN (95). This means that BUSE’s stock grew somewhat faster than LKFN’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's SMR Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LKFN (24). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to LKFN’s over the last 12 months.

BUSE's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as LKFN (52). This means that BUSE’s stock grew similarly to LKFN’s over the last 12 months.

LKFN's P/E Growth Rating (71) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BUSE (85). This means that LKFN’s stock grew similarly to BUSE’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BUSELKFN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
57%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 20, 2026
Stock price -- (BUSE: $30.32 vs. LKFN: $59.70)
Brand notoriety: BUSE and LKFN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BUSE: 437% vs. LKFN: 504%
Market capitalization -- BUSE: $2.5B vs. LKFN: $1.48B
BUSE [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.5B. LKFN’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.48B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $171.3B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BUSE’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while LKFN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BUSE’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • LKFN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BUSE is a better buy in the long-term than LKFN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BUSE’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LKFN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BUSE’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • LKFN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, LKFN is a better buy in the short-term than BUSE.

Price Growth

BUSE (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.39% price change this week, while LKFN (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.35%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

BUSE is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

LKFN is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.03% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BUSE
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
LKFN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
USNZ48.29N/A
N/A
Xtrackers Net Zero Pathway Paris Aligned US Equity ETF (USNZ)
TRUF29.13N/A
-0.01%
VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF)
MMCA20.94-0.05
-0.24%
NYLIM MacKay California Muni Intermediate ETF (MMCA)
VCEB60.67-0.23
-0.37%
Vanguard ESG U.S. Corporate Bond ETF (VCEB)
JANI25.71-0.13
-0.50%
AllianzIM International Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Jan ETF (JANI)

LKFN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LKFN has been closely correlated with BY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LKFN jumps, then BY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LKFN
1D Price
Change %
LKFN100%
+0.12%
BY - LKFN
81%
Closely correlated
-0.24%
SRCE - LKFN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
PEBO - LKFN
80%
Closely correlated
-0.23%
CAC - LKFN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
BUSE - LKFN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.56%
More