Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$41.10
Change+$0.54 (+1.33%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.11M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$91.44
Change+$0.04 (+0.04%)
Volume$100
Net Assets841.56M
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Jul 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a StrongBuy and FWD is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 842M vs. BUYZ (8.11M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FWD (15.419) vs BUYZ (9.893). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (5 years) vs FWD (2 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (38.02) vs BUYZ (38.02).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 9.893 | 15.419 | 64% |
| Net Assets | 8.11M | 842M | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 163.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 88% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been closely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 68% Closely correlated | +3.28% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 64% Loosely correlated | -2.39% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +2.18% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +3.36% | ||
| FOUR - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.70% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +1.36% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | +1.40% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | +3.02% | ||
| JCI - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +1.56% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.38% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.42% | ||
More | ||||