Ad is loading...
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$39.22
Change+$0.28 (+0.72%)
Volume$453
CapitalizationN/A
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$85.26
Change+$1.96 (+2.35%)
Volume$4.81K
CapitalizationN/A
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Dec 11, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a StrongSell and FWD is a StrongSell.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 501M vs. BUYZ (13.6M). BUYZ (35.205) and FWD (33.586) have matching annual dividend yield . BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (5 years) vs FWD (2 years). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (47.01) vs BUYZ (47.01).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 35.205 | 33.586 | 105% |
| Net Assets | 13.6M | 501M | 3% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 47.01 | 90.00 | 52% |
| Yield | 0.00 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 64% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 90% | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 68% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | -0.23% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -1.14% | ||
| VCSA - BUYZ | 16% Poorly correlated | -4.39% | ||
| ZI - BUYZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -4.47% | ||
| SSTK - BUYZ | 8% Poorly correlated | -0.37% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | -2.02% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | -3.00% | ||
| AMAT - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| ASML - FWD | 75% Closely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| MPWR - FWD | 73% Closely correlated | -2.35% | ||
| ONTO - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | -3.34% | ||
More | ||||