Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$40.34
Change-$0.26 (-0.64%)
Volume$150
Net Assets8.12M
AB Disruptors ETF
Price$89.37
Change-$0.29 (-0.32%)
Volume$120
Net Assets781.79M
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Jul 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and FWD is a StrongBuy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 782M vs. BUYZ (8.12M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FWD (13.221) vs BUYZ (9.997). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (5 years) vs FWD (2 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (38.02) vs BUYZ (38.02).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | 9.997 | 13.221 | 76% |
| Net Assets | 8.12M | 782M | 1% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 163.00 | 23% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 62% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 73% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 70% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been closely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +0.80% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 67% Closely correlated | +2.53% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.56% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +0.10% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.98% | ||
| FOUR - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.93% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with APH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then APH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | +0.97% | ||
| APH - FWD | 82% Closely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| LITE - FWD | 80% Closely correlated | -0.95% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | +0.43% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 78% Closely correlated | -0.02% | ||
| JCI - FWD | 77% Closely correlated | +0.95% | ||
More | ||||