Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Jun 06, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and FWD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 3.02B vs. BUYZ (5.15M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FWD (29.212) vs BUYZ (-17.334). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (6 years) vs FWD (3 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (38.02) vs BUYZ (38.02).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | -17.334 | 29.212 | -59% |
| Net Assets | 5.15M | 3.02B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 196.00 | 19% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 68% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago 86% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BUYZ and ADSK have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BUYZ and ADSK's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | -1.71% | ||
| ADSK - BUYZ | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.58% | ||
| V - BUYZ | 10% Poorly correlated | +1.06% | ||
| GTM - BUYZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -2.15% | ||
| MA - BUYZ | 9% Poorly correlated | +1.93% | ||
| WIX - BUYZ | 9% Poorly correlated | -2.44% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with LRCX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then LRCX could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | -6.69% | ||
| LRCX - FWD | 79% Closely correlated | -9.85% | ||
| AMAT - FWD | 73% Closely correlated | -9.71% | ||
| KLAC - FWD | 73% Closely correlated | -9.47% | ||
| ASML - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | -6.59% | ||
| TER - FWD | 71% Closely correlated | -12.03% | ||
More | ||||