Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs FWD
BUYZ vs FWD Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. FWD commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and FWD is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FWD has more net assets: 3.12B vs. BUYZ (5.29M). FWD has a higher annual dividend yield than BUYZ: FWD (27.737) vs BUYZ (-13.774). BUYZ was incepted earlier than FWD: BUYZ (6 years) vs FWD (3 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than FWD (0.65). FWD has a higher turnover BUYZ (34.00) vs BUYZ (34.00).
| BUYZ | FWD | BUYZ / FWD | |
| Gain YTD | -13.774 | 27.737 | -50% |
| Net Assets | 5.29M | 3.12B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.65 | 77% |
| Turnover | 34.00 | 196.00 | 17% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.08 | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | FWD | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 76% | 7 days ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 81% | 1 day ago 74% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 83% | 1 day ago 74% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 85% | 6 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 22 days ago 79% | 1 day ago 69% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 78% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 89% | 1 day ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BUYZ and EXPE have been poorly correlated (+17% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BUYZ and EXPE's prices will move in lockstep.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | N/A | ||
| EXPE - BUYZ | 17% Poorly correlated | -1.92% | ||
| LYFT - BUYZ | 14% Poorly correlated | +0.38% | ||
| U - BUYZ | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.68% | ||
| FICO - BUYZ | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.19% | ||
| RBLX - BUYZ | 13% Poorly correlated | -0.58% | ||
More | ||||
FWD and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FWD has been closely correlated with ONTO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FWD jumps, then ONTO could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FWD | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FWD | 100% | -3.47% | ||
| ONTO - FWD | 76% Closely correlated | -5.36% | ||
| MPWR - FWD | 75% Closely correlated | -4.54% | ||
| ETN - FWD | 75% Closely correlated | -1.09% | ||
| VRT - FWD | 72% Closely correlated | -4.07% | ||
| TER - FWD | 71% Closely correlated | -5.14% | ||
More | ||||