Ad is loading...
BUYZ vs GBUY
BUYZ vs GBUY Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs GBUY
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$38.19
Change+$0.11 (+0.29%)
Volume$2.62K
Net Assets17.14M
Goldman Sachs Future Consumer Equity ETF
Price$36.15
Change+$0.01 (+0.03%)
Volume$376
Net Assets35.93M
BUYZ vs GBUY Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. GBUY commentary
Jan 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and GBUY is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBUY has more net assets: 35.9M vs. BUYZ (17.1M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than GBUY: BUYZ (3.466) vs GBUY (2.732). BUYZ was incepted earlier than GBUY: BUYZ (5 years) vs GBUY (3 years). BUYZ has a higher turnover GBUY (16.00) vs GBUY (16.00).
| BUYZ | GBUY | BUYZ / GBUY | |
| Gain YTD | 3.466 | 2.732 | 127% |
| Net Assets | 17.1M | 35.9M | 48% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 47.01 | 16.00 | 294% |
| Yield | 0.00 | 0.40 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 3 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | GBUY | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 85% | 16 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 87% | 16 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 81% | 16 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 18 days ago 90% | 18 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 80% | 16 days ago 82% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 16 days ago 84% | N/A |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been loosely correlated with NTDOY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then NTDOY could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | +0.29% | ||
| NTDOY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | +2.25% | ||
| ADYEY - BUYZ | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.19% | ||
| VCSA - BUYZ | 16% Poorly correlated | +0.20% | ||
| ZI - BUYZ | 10% Poorly correlated | -0.90% | ||
| SSTK - BUYZ | 8% Poorly correlated | -4.54% | ||
More | ||||
GBUY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GBUY has been loosely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GBUY jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To GBUY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GBUY | 100% | +0.56% | ||
| AMZN - GBUY | 66% Loosely correlated | +1.86% | ||
| BLK - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| AMD - GBUY | 57% Loosely correlated | +1.20% | ||
| META - GBUY | 56% Loosely correlated | +1.14% | ||
| TER - GBUY | 54% Loosely correlated | +1.89% | ||
More | ||||