Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs PCGG
BUYZ vs PCGG Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs PCGG
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$40.22
Change-$0.37 (-0.91%)
Volume$350
Net Assets8.16M
Polen Capital Global Growth ETF
Price$12.05
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$281
Net Assets181.99M
BUYZ vs PCGG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. PCGG commentary
Jul 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Buy and PCGG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCGG has more net assets: 182M vs. BUYZ (8.16M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than PCGG: BUYZ (9.124) vs PCGG (2.295). BUYZ was incepted earlier than PCGG: BUYZ (5 years) vs PCGG (2 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than PCGG (0.85). BUYZ has a higher turnover PCGG (17.61) vs PCGG (17.61).
| BUYZ | PCGG | BUYZ / PCGG | |
| Gain YTD | 9.124 | 2.295 | 397% |
| Net Assets | 8.16M | 182M | 4% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.85 | 59% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 17.61 | 216% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.00 | - |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 2 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | PCGG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 86% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 84% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 8 days ago 86% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 85% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been closely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | -0.64% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 67% Closely correlated | -2.88% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.02% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 58% Loosely correlated | -4.91% | ||
| FOUR - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.69% | ||
More | ||||
PCGG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PCGG has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PCGG jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PCGG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCGG | 100% | -0.50% | ||
| AMZN - PCGG | 80% Closely correlated | +0.03% | ||
| ADSK - PCGG | 76% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| MSFT - PCGG | 72% Closely correlated | -0.22% | ||
| SHOP - PCGG | 72% Closely correlated | +0.12% | ||
| MA - PCGG | 71% Closely correlated | -0.72% | ||
More | ||||