Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BUYZ vs TMFG
BUYZ vs TMFG Comparison
Open Charts BUYZ vs TMFG
Franklin Disruptive Commerce ETF
Price$40.13
Change-$0.17 (-0.42%)
Volume$243
Net Assets7.99M
Motley Fool Global Opportunities ETF
Price$29.95
Change-$0.34 (-1.12%)
Volume$12.25K
Net Assets397.9M
BUYZ vs TMFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BUYZ vs. TMFG commentary
Jul 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BUYZ is a Hold and TMFG is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMFG has more net assets: 398M vs. BUYZ (7.99M). BUYZ has a higher annual dividend yield than TMFG: BUYZ (8.160) vs TMFG (5.718). BUYZ was incepted earlier than TMFG: BUYZ (5 years) vs TMFG (11 years). BUYZ (0.50) has a lower expense ratio than TMFG (0.85). BUYZ (38.02) and TMFG (38.00) have matching turnover.
| BUYZ | TMFG | BUYZ / TMFG | |
| Gain YTD | 8.160 | 5.718 | 143% |
| Net Assets | 7.99M | 398M | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.85 | 59% |
| Turnover | 38.02 | 38.00 | 100% |
| Yield | 0.06 | 0.35 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 11 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BUYZ | TMFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 89% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 88% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 86% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 81% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 81% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
BUYZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BUYZ has been closely correlated with TOST. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BUYZ jumps, then TOST could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BUYZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BUYZ | 100% | -0.94% | ||
| TOST - BUYZ | 67% Closely correlated | -1.97% | ||
| HUBS - BUYZ | 61% Loosely correlated | -5.33% | ||
| SPOT - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| AFRM - BUYZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -5.58% | ||
| FOUR - BUYZ | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.61% | ||
More | ||||
TMFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFG has been loosely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TMFG jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFG | 100% | -1.11% | ||
| BAM - TMFG | 62% Loosely correlated | -0.80% | ||
| BN - TMFG | 58% Loosely correlated | -1.25% | ||
| SNEX - TMFG | 57% Loosely correlated | -5.10% | ||
| ICLR - TMFG | 52% Loosely correlated | -0.01% | ||
| WSO - TMFG | 50% Loosely correlated | -1.31% | ||
More | ||||