BVN
Price
$12.94
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Apr 8 closing price
Capitalization
3.91B
21 days until earnings call
SBYSF
Price
$0.87
Change
-$0.18 (-17.14%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
5.42B
Ad is loading...

BVN vs SBYSF

Header iconBVN vs SBYSF Comparison
Open Charts BVN vs SBYSFBanner chart's image
Compania de Minas Buenaventura SA
Price$12.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.38M
Capitalization3.91B
Sibanye Stillwater
Price$0.87
Change-$0.18 (-17.14%)
Volume$100
Capitalization5.42B
BVN vs SBYSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BVN vs. SBYSF commentary
Apr 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BVN is a Hold and SBYSF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BVN: $12.94 vs. SBYSF: $0.87)
Brand notoriety: BVN and SBYSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BVN: 116% vs. SBYSF: 3%
Market capitalization -- BVN: $3.91B vs. SBYSF: $5.42B
BVN [@Precious Metals] is valued at $3.91B. SBYSF’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $5.42B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $47.49B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $1.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BVN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSBYSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BVN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SBYSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BVN is a better buy in the long-term than SBYSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BVN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BVN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BVN (@Precious Metals) experienced а -16.78% price change this week, while SBYSF (@Precious Metals) price change was -17.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was -6.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

BVN is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (-6.65% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SBYSF($5.42B) has a higher market cap than BVN($3.91B). BVN has higher P/E ratio than SBYSF: BVN (6.95) vs SBYSF (4.89). BVN YTD gains are higher at: 12.326 vs. SBYSF (-3.025). SBYSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 33.1B vs. BVN (178M). SBYSF has more cash in the bank: 27.2B vs. BVN (222M). BVN has less debt than SBYSF: BVN (50M) vs SBYSF (21.2B). SBYSF has higher revenues than BVN: SBYSF (153B) vs BVN (816M).
BVNSBYSFBVN / SBYSF
Capitalization3.91B5.42B72%
EBITDA178M33.1B1%
Gain YTD12.326-3.025-407%
P/E Ratio6.954.89142%
Revenue816M153B1%
Total Cash222M27.2B1%
Total Debt50M21.2B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BVN vs SBYSF: Fundamental Ratings
BVN
SBYSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7999
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
40100
SMR RATING
1..100
6437
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5357
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1549
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SBYSF's Valuation (11) in the null industry is in the same range as BVN (20) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SBYSF’s stock grew similarly to BVN’s over the last 12 months.

BVN's Profit vs Risk Rating (40) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBYSF (100) in the null industry. This means that BVN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBYSF’s over the last 12 months.

SBYSF's SMR Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BVN (64) in the Precious Metals industry. This means that SBYSF’s stock grew similarly to BVN’s over the last 12 months.

BVN's Price Growth Rating (53) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as SBYSF (57) in the null industry. This means that BVN’s stock grew similarly to SBYSF’s over the last 12 months.

BVN's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SBYSF (49) in the null industry. This means that BVN’s stock grew somewhat faster than SBYSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BVN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 23 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BVN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SZK13.390.40
+3.08%
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Staples
EUO31.410.34
+1.09%
ProShares UltraShort Euro
YJUN21.32-0.19
-0.86%
FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bf ETF June
CXSE28.05-0.51
-1.79%
WisdomTree China ex-State-Owd Entpr ETF
TNA19.12-1.67
-8.03%
Direxion Daily Small Cap Bull 3X ETF

BVN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BVN has been loosely correlated with PAAS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BVN jumps, then PAAS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVN
1D Price
Change %
BVN100%
N/A
PAAS - BVN
62%
Loosely correlated
-0.69%
MAG - BVN
58%
Loosely correlated
-5.78%
CDE - BVN
57%
Loosely correlated
-4.94%
WPM - BVN
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.17%
AGI - BVN
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.12%
More

SBYSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SBYSF and CCHI have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SBYSF and CCHI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SBYSF
1D Price
Change %
SBYSF100%
N/A
CCHI - SBYSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBSW - SBYSF
25%
Poorly correlated
-6.12%
BVN - SBYSF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NRRSF - SBYSF
24%
Poorly correlated
+7.38%
SRCRF - SBYSF
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.66%
More