BVS
Price
$11.10
Change
-$0.05 (-0.45%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:07 PM (EDT)
92 days until earnings call
NOTV
Price
$4.10
Change
-$1.45 (-26.13%)
Updated
Dec 18, 04:25 PM (EDT)
57 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BVS vs NOTV

Header iconBVS vs NOTV Comparison
Open Charts BVS vs NOTVBanner chart's image
Bioventus
Price$11.10
Change-$0.05 (-0.45%)
Volume$400
CapitalizationN/A
Inotiv
Price$4.10
Change-$1.45 (-26.13%)
Volume$1.5K
CapitalizationN/A
BVS vs NOTV Comparison Chart
Loading...
BVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOTV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BVS vs. NOTV commentary
Dec 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BVS is a Hold and NOTV is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BVS: $11.15 vs. NOTV: $5.55)
Brand notoriety: BVS and NOTV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BVS: 62% vs. NOTV: 100%
Market capitalization -- BVS: $330.84M vs. NOTV: $254.55M
BVS [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $330.84M. NOTV’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $254.55M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BVS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileNOTV’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BVS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • NOTV’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BVS and NOTV are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BVS’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NOTV’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BVS’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NOTV’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, NOTV is a better buy in the short-term than BVS.

Price Growth

BVS (@Medical Specialties) experienced а -2.36% price change this week, while NOTV (@Medical Specialties) price change was +14.67% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -2.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.95%.

Reported Earning Dates

BVS is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2025.

NOTV is expected to report earnings on Feb 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (-2.04% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BVS($331M) has a higher market cap than NOTV($255M). NOTV has higher P/E ratio than BVS: NOTV (169.49) vs BVS (10.66). BVS YTD gains are higher at: 111.575 vs. NOTV (51.226). NOTV has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 59M vs. BVS (-23.07M). BVS has more cash in the bank: 37M vs. NOTV (22M). BVS has less debt than NOTV: BVS (395M) vs NOTV (429M). NOTV has higher revenues than BVS: NOTV (585M) vs BVS (512M).
BVSNOTVBVS / NOTV
Capitalization331M255M130%
EBITDA-23.07M59M-39%
Gain YTD111.57551.226218%
P/E Ratio10.66169.496%
Revenue512M585M88%
Total Cash37M22M168%
Total Debt395M429M92%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NOTV: Fundamental Ratings
NOTV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
25
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
95
SMR RATING
1..100
97
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
34
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
81
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BVSNOTV
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BVS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NOTV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VARAX10.31N/A
N/A
FirstTrust Merger Arbitrage Cl A
GGHPX7.01N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Intl Eq Div & Prem P
MFSIX11.64N/A
N/A
Madison Sustainable Equity I
JLCVX83.27-0.45
-0.54%
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core R5
HSCCX3.35-0.05
-1.47%
Carillon Eagle Small Cap Growth C

BVS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BVS has been loosely correlated with AORT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BVS jumps, then AORT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BVS
1D Price
Change %
BVS100%
N/A
AORT - BVS
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
RDNT - BVS
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
OFIX - BVS
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.44%
TCMD - BVS
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.39%
CSTL - BVS
28%
Poorly correlated
-2.29%
More

NOTV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NOTV has been loosely correlated with RGEN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if NOTV jumps, then RGEN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NOTV
1D Price
Change %
NOTV100%
-4.48%
RGEN - NOTV
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
AKYA - NOTV
34%
Loosely correlated
+4.96%
CRL - NOTV
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.39%
CDNA - NOTV
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.19%
BVS - NOTV
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More