BWFG
Price
$37.25
Change
-$1.09 (-2.84%)
Updated
Jul 15 closing price
Capitalization
200.1M
12 days until earnings call
FRAF
Price
$38.38
Change
-$0.62 (-1.59%)
Updated
Jul 15, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
113.45M
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWFG vs FRAF

Header iconBWFG vs FRAF Comparison
Open Charts BWFG vs FRAFBanner chart's image
Bankwell Financial Group
Price$37.25
Change-$1.09 (-2.84%)
Volume$23.85K
Capitalization200.1M
Franklin Financial Services
Price$38.38
Change-$0.62 (-1.59%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization113.45M
BWFG vs FRAF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BWFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWFG vs. FRAF commentary
Jul 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWFG is a StrongBuy and FRAF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 16, 2025
Stock price -- (BWFG: $37.25 vs. FRAF: $38.39)
Brand notoriety: BWFG and FRAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWFG: 137% vs. FRAF: 133%
Market capitalization -- BWFG: $200.1M vs. FRAF: $113.45M
BWFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $200.1M. FRAF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $113.45M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFRAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BWFG and FRAF are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWFG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FRAF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FRAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BWFG and FRAF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BWFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while FRAF (@Regional Banks) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.54%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.21%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.

FRAF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.54% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWFG($200M) has a higher market cap than FRAF($113M). FRAF has higher P/E ratio than BWFG: FRAF (8.33) vs BWFG (5.40). FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 30.637 vs. BWFG (21.045). FRAF (154M) and BWFG (159M) have identical debt. BWFG has higher revenues than FRAF: BWFG (99.3M) vs FRAF (67.3M).
BWFGFRAFBWFG / FRAF
Capitalization200M113M177%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.04530.63769%
P/E Ratio5.408.3365%
Revenue99.3M67.3M148%
Total CashN/A20.1M-
Total Debt159M154M103%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWFG vs FRAF: Fundamental Ratings
BWFG
FRAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
243
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2122
SMR RATING
1..100
10046
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4042
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10012
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
85n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWFG's Valuation (50) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (59). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (22). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's SMR Rating (46) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BWFG (100). This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BWFG’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (42). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for BWFG (100). This means that FRAF’s stock grew significantly faster than BWFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWFGFRAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 28 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BWFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENZB0.68N/A
+0.08%
Enzo Biochem Inc.
NHOLF28.62N/A
N/A
Sompo Hldgs Inc
ALID0.01N/A
N/A
Allied Corp.
IRMTF23.99N/A
N/A
Information Svcs Corp
LABFF90.61N/A
N/A
LABORATORIOS FARMACEUTICOS ROVI SA

BWFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWFG has been closely correlated with HTB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWFG jumps, then HTB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWFG
1D Price
Change %
BWFG100%
-2.84%
HTB - BWFG
75%
Closely correlated
-1.81%
PFIS - BWFG
75%
Closely correlated
-2.00%
CAC - BWFG
74%
Closely correlated
-3.50%
ONB - BWFG
74%
Closely correlated
-3.82%
UBSI - BWFG
74%
Closely correlated
-3.64%
More

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 46% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
-1.56%
FUNC - FRAF
46%
Loosely correlated
-2.02%
MRBK - FRAF
42%
Loosely correlated
-1.21%
WNEB - FRAF
42%
Loosely correlated
-2.12%
FCCO - FRAF
39%
Loosely correlated
-1.83%
CWBC - FRAF
39%
Loosely correlated
-3.59%
More