BWFG
Price
$30.47
Change
-$0.41 (-1.33%)
Updated
Sep 13 closing price
37 days until earnings call
FSFG
Price
$23.41
Change
-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Updated
Sep 13 closing price
45 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BWFG vs FSFG

Header iconBWFG vs FSFG Comparison
Open Charts BWFG vs FSFGBanner chart's image
Bankwell Financial Group
Price$30.47
Change-$0.41 (-1.33%)
Volume$30.9K
CapitalizationN/A
First Savings Financial Group
Price$23.41
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
Volume$5.92K
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
BWFG vs FSFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BWFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
VS
BWFG vs. FSFG commentary
Sep 16, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWFG is a StrongBuy and FSFG is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 16, 2024
Stock price -- (BWFG: $30.47 vs. FSFG: $23.41)
Brand notoriety: BWFG and FSFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWFG: 195% vs. FSFG: 60%
Market capitalization -- BWFG: $200.1M vs. FSFG: $115.29M
BWFG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $200.1M. FSFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $115.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BWFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWFG is a better buy in the long-term than FSFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWFG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BWFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

BWFG (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.20% price change this week, while FSFG (@Regional Banks) price change was +0.64% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.07%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2024.

FSFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 31, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWFG($200M) has a higher market cap than FSFG($115M). FSFG has higher P/E ratio than BWFG: FSFG (18.62) vs BWFG (5.40). FSFG YTD gains are higher at: 42.825 vs. BWFG (3.402). BWFG has less debt than FSFG: BWFG (159M) vs FSFG (405M). BWFG has higher revenues than FSFG: BWFG (99.3M) vs FSFG (82.3M).
BWFGFSFGBWFG / FSFG
Capitalization200M115M174%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.40242.8258%
P/E Ratio5.4018.6229%
Revenue99.3M82.3M121%
Total CashN/A17.5M-
Total Debt159M405M39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWFG vs FSFG: Fundamental Ratings
BWFG
FSFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2981
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5364
SMR RATING
1..100
3853
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3937
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1212
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BWFG's Valuation (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (46). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (53) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (64). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

BWFG's SMR Rating (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSFG (53). This means that BWFG’s stock grew similarly to FSFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BWFG (39). This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to BWFG’s over the last 12 months.

FSFG's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BWFG (12). This means that FSFG’s stock grew similarly to BWFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BWFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FBIOX21.720.48
+2.26%
Fidelity Select Biotechnology
RYMVX72.791.57
+2.20%
Rydex S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value A
RAAIX13.460.21
+1.58%
Altegris/AACA Opportunistic Real Estt I
FMSTX34.040.38
+1.13%
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value IS
ABVAX18.530.18
+0.98%
AB Value A

BWFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWFG has been closely correlated with WTBA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BWFG jumps, then WTBA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWFG
1D Price
Change %
BWFG100%
-1.33%
WTBA - BWFG
67%
Closely correlated
+3.21%
SMBC - BWFG
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.68%
CNOB - BWFG
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.81%
CAC - BWFG
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.76%
FISI - BWFG
64%
Loosely correlated
+4.07%
More

FSFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSFG has been loosely correlated with BWFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSFG jumps, then BWFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSFG
1D Price
Change %
FSFG100%
+0.60%
BWFG - FSFG
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.33%
CFSB - FSFG
33%
Loosely correlated
N/A
TBNK - FSFG
33%
Poorly correlated
+6.13%
CHMG - FSFG
32%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
BFIN - FSFG
31%
Poorly correlated
+1.79%
More