BWLKF
Price
$0.08
Change
+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
19.96M
PET
Price
$0.15
Change
+$0.01 (+7.14%)
Updated
May 30 closing price
Capitalization
79.56M
66 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BWLKF vs PET

Header iconBWLKF vs PET Comparison
Open Charts BWLKF vs PETBanner chart's image
Boardwalktech Software
Price$0.08
Change+$0.01 (+14.29%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization19.96M
Wag! Group
Price$0.15
Change+$0.01 (+7.14%)
Volume$6.1M
Capitalization79.56M
BWLKF vs PET Comparison Chart
Loading...
PET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWLKF vs. PET commentary
Jun 02, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWLKF is a Hold and PET is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 02, 2025
Stock price -- (BWLKF: $0.08 vs. PET: $0.15)
Brand notoriety: BWLKF and PET are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWLKF: 9% vs. PET: 106%
Market capitalization -- BWLKF: $19.96M vs. PET: $79.56M
BWLKF [@Packaged Software] is valued at $19.96M. PET’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $79.56M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWLKF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePET’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BWLKF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PET’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, PET is a better buy in the long-term than BWLKF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

PET’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • PET’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.

Price Growth

BWLKF (@Packaged Software) experienced а -1.69% price change this week, while PET (@Packaged Software) price change was +8.09% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +1.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.72%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

PET is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+1.64% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PET($79.6M) has a higher market cap than BWLKF($20M). BWLKF YTD gains are higher at: 5.278 vs. PET (-35.501). BWLKF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -3.39M vs. PET (-4.69M). PET has more cash in the bank: 18.3M vs. BWLKF (373K). BWLKF has less debt than PET: BWLKF (225K) vs PET (28.6M). PET has higher revenues than BWLKF: PET (83.9M) vs BWLKF (6.02M).
BWLKFPETBWLKF / PET
Capitalization20M79.6M25%
EBITDA-3.39M-4.69M72%
Gain YTD5.278-35.501-15%
P/E RatioN/A1.57-
Revenue6.02M83.9M7%
Total Cash373K18.3M2%
Total Debt225K28.6M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BWLKF: Fundamental Ratings
BWLKF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
84
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
PET
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
PET
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SPYX48.600.04
+0.08%
SPDR® S&P 500 Fossil Fuel Rsrv Free ETF
MMIN23.19-0.01
-0.03%
NYLI MacKay Muni Insured ETF
TOLL33.42-0.05
-0.15%
Tema Monopolies and Oligopolies ETF
EWV33.43-0.08
-0.24%
ProShares UltraShort MSCI Japan
ISMD34.12-0.28
-0.81%
Inspire Small/Mid Cap ETF

BWLKF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BWLKF and PET have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BWLKF and PET's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWLKF
1D Price
Change %
BWLKF100%
+14.35%
PET - BWLKF
21%
Poorly correlated
+8.24%
AIMLF - BWLKF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
CCOEF - BWLKF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BTGHF - BWLKF
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CIOXY - BWLKF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

PET and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PET has been loosely correlated with ZETA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PET jumps, then ZETA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PET
1D Price
Change %
PET100%
+8.24%
ZETA - PET
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.38%
PSFE - PET
43%
Loosely correlated
-1.20%
GTM - PET
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.47%
PLUS - PET
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.35%
SOUN - PET
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.99%
More