Ad is loading...
BWMN
Price
$25.32
Change
+$0.14 (+0.56%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
126 days until earnings call
WLGS
Price
$3.62
Change
-$0.32 (-8.12%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

BWMN vs WLGS

Header iconBWMN vs WLGS Comparison
Open Charts BWMN vs WLGSBanner chart's image
Bowman Consulting Group
Price$25.32
Change+$0.14 (+0.56%)
Volume$103.67K
CapitalizationN/A
Wang & Lee Group
Price$3.62
Change-$0.32 (-8.12%)
Volume$45.84K
CapitalizationN/A
BWMN vs WLGS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BWMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WLGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BWMN vs. WLGS commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BWMN is a Sell and WLGS is a StrongSell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (BWMN: $25.32 vs. WLGS: $3.62)
Brand notoriety: BWMN and WLGS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BWMN: 112% vs. WLGS: 15%
Market capitalization -- BWMN: $443.86M vs. WLGS: $54.64M
BWMN [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $443.86M. WLGS’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $54.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $14.67T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $5.89B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BWMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileWLGS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BWMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • WLGS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWMN is a better buy in the long-term than WLGS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BWMN’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WLGS’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BWMN’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WLGS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWMN is a better buy in the short-term than WLGS.

Price Growth

BWMN (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а +1.12% price change this week, while WLGS (@Engineering & Construction) price change was +3.13% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.61%.

Reported Earning Dates

BWMN is expected to report earnings on Mar 24, 2025.

WLGS is expected to report earnings on Apr 20, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (+0.30% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWMN($444M) has a higher market cap than WLGS($54.6M). WLGS YTD gains are higher at: 406.294 vs. BWMN (-28.716).
BWMNWLGSBWMN / WLGS
Capitalization444M54.6M813%
EBITDA18.2MN/A-
Gain YTD-28.716406.294-7%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue387MN/A-
Total Cash23.1MN/A-
Total Debt140MN/A-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BWMNWLGS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
87%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BWMN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
WLGS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HEMZX6.93-0.02
-0.29%
Virtus SGA Emerging Markets Equity A
CVQZX9.94-0.03
-0.30%
Columbia Disciplined Value Inst
GEBSX10.10-0.03
-0.30%
Goldman Sachs ESG Em Mkts Eq R6
JMIEX31.05-0.24
-0.77%
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity L
PHLQX49.17-1.84
-3.61%
PGIM Jennison Health Sciences R6

BWMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWMN has been loosely correlated with STRL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWMN jumps, then STRL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWMN
1D Price
Change %
BWMN100%
+0.56%
STRL - BWMN
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.29%
BLD - BWMN
39%
Loosely correlated
-4.45%
GVA - BWMN
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
PRIM - BWMN
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.06%
APG - BWMN
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.32%
More

WLGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that WLGS and ACSAF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that WLGS and ACSAF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WLGS
1D Price
Change %
WLGS100%
-8.13%
ACSAF - WLGS
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTRX - WLGS
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.34%
BWMN - WLGS
15%
Poorly correlated
+0.56%
SLND - WLGS
14%
Poorly correlated
+2.41%
ACA - WLGS
12%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
More