Advertisement
APG vs BWMN
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is APG is a Hold and BWMN is a Buy.
| APG | BWMN | APG / BWMN | |
| Capitalization | 16.4B | 735M | 2,231% |
| EBITDA | 939M | 46.6M | 2,015% |
| Gain YTD | -1.045 | 28.468 | -4% |
| P/E Ratio | 125.36 | 101.00 | 124% |
| Revenue | 8.44B | 528M | 1,598% |
| Total Cash | 851M | 10.5M | 8,105% |
| Total Debt | 3.84B | 285M | 1,348% |
APG | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 90 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 23 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| APG | BWMN | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 56% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 69% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 64% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 72% | 12 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 2 days ago 66% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 83% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
APG’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while BWMN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- APG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- BWMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
APG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BWMN’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- APG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
- BWMN’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
APG (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -5.44% price change this week, while BWMN (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -0.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.40%.
Reported Earning Dates
APG is expected to report earnings on Oct 29, 2026.
BWMN is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Engineering & Construction (-3.36% weekly)Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| RNGBX | 71.27 | 0.25 | +0.35% |
| American Funds New Economy R-2 | |||
| TORCX | 23.07 | N/A | N/A |
| Tortoise Energy Infrastructure TR C | |||
| HLMOX | 9.59 | N/A | N/A |
| Harding Loevner Frontier Emerg Mkts Inv | |||
| MLNAX | 29.56 | N/A | N/A |
| Morgan Stanley Instl Glbl Concntr A | |||
| FTZCX | 75.24 | N/A | N/A |
| FullerThaler Behvrll Uncnstd Eq C | |||
APG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, APG has been loosely correlated with FIX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if APG jumps, then FIX could also see price increases.
BWMN and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWMN has been loosely correlated with ORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWMN jumps, then ORN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BWMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BWMN | 100% | -0.21% | ||
| ORN - BWMN | 48% Loosely correlated | +3.31% | ||
| GVA - BWMN | 45% Loosely correlated | +3.18% | ||
| APG - BWMN | 40% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
| ACM - BWMN | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.02% | ||
| PRIM - BWMN | 38% Loosely correlated | +3.17% | ||
More | ||||