BXLC
Price
$40.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Mar 28 closing price
Capitalization
25.46M
FFXDF
Price
$15.60
Change
-$0.90 (-5.45%)
Updated
Apr 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.96B
Ad is loading...

BXLC vs FFXDF

Header iconBXLC vs FFXDF Comparison
Open Charts BXLC vs FFXDFBanner chart's image
Bexil
Price$40.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$150
Capitalization25.46M
Fairfax India
Price$15.60
Change-$0.90 (-5.45%)
Volume$139.09K
Capitalization1.96B
BXLC vs FFXDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BXLC vs. FFXDF commentary
Apr 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXLC is a Hold and FFXDF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 07, 2025
Stock price -- (BXLC: $40.00 vs. FFXDF: $15.60)
Brand notoriety: BXLC and FFXDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BXLC: 77% vs. FFXDF: 271%
Market capitalization -- BXLC: $25.46M vs. FFXDF: $1.96B
BXLC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $25.46M. FFXDF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.96B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BXLC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFFXDF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BXLC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FFXDF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BXLC is a better buy in the long-term than FFXDF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FFXDF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FFXDF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BXLC (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FFXDF (@Investment Managers) price change was -5.28% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -5.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

BXLC is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-5.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFXDF($1.96B) has a higher market cap than BXLC($25.5M). BXLC YTD gains are higher at: 0.000 vs. FFXDF (-2.524). FFXDF has higher revenues than BXLC: FFXDF (112M) vs BXLC (1.02M).
BXLCFFXDFBXLC / FFXDF
Capitalization25.5M1.96B1%
EBITDA-2.84MN/A-
Gain YTD0.000-2.524-
P/E RatioN/A25.45-
Revenue1.02M112M1%
Total Cash30.3MN/A-
Total DebtN/A497M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BXLC vs FFXDF: Fundamental Ratings
BXLC
FFXDF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1030
SMR RATING
1..100
691
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4756
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3915
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BXLC's Valuation (58) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXDF (71). This means that BXLC’s stock grew similarly to FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

BXLC's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXDF (30). This means that BXLC’s stock grew similarly to FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

BXLC's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFXDF (91). This means that BXLC’s stock grew significantly faster than FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

BXLC's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXDF (56). This means that BXLC’s stock grew similarly to FFXDF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXDF's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the null industry is in the same range as BXLC (39). This means that FFXDF’s stock grew similarly to BXLC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FFXDF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FFXDF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PGF14.07-0.08
-0.57%
Invesco Financial Preferred ETF
EPHE23.83-1.21
-4.83%
iShares MSCI Philippines ETF
IGV81.30-5.33
-6.15%
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sect ETF
CEFA29.10-1.93
-6.23%
Global X S&P Cthlc Vls Dvlpd ex-US ETF
QMOM52.34-3.96
-7.03%
Alpha Architect US Quantitative Momt ETF

BXLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXLC has been loosely correlated with IDTVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BXLC jumps, then IDTVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BXLC
1D Price
Change %
BXLC100%
N/A
IDTVF - BXLC
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CEVIY - BXLC
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXDF - BXLC
10%
Poorly correlated
-5.45%
MGLD - BXLC
6%
Poorly correlated
-10.09%
CYMBF - BXLC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FFXDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFXDF and WNDLF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFXDF and WNDLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFXDF
1D Price
Change %
FFXDF100%
-5.45%
WNDLF - FFXDF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HLNE - FFXDF
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.71%
GAIN - FFXDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-6.69%
STT - FFXDF
23%
Poorly correlated
-7.94%
GSBD - FFXDF
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.11%
More