BXLC
Price
$40.00
Change
-$2.00 (-4.76%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
Capitalization
25.46M
FFXXF
Price
$2.25
Change
-$0.12 (-5.06%)
Updated
Jan 16 closing price
Capitalization
294.61M
Ad is loading...

BXLC vs FFXXF

Header iconBXLC vs FFXXF Comparison
Open Charts BXLC vs FFXXFBanner chart's image
Bexil
Price$40.00
Change-$2.00 (-4.76%)
Volume$200
Capitalization25.46M
HELIOS FAIRFAX PARTNERS
Price$2.25
Change-$0.12 (-5.06%)
Volume$1.27K
Capitalization294.61M
BXLC vs FFXXF Comparison Chart
Loading...
BXLC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BXLC vs. FFXXF commentary
Jan 20, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BXLC is a Hold and FFXXF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 20, 2025
Stock price -- (BXLC: $40.00 vs. FFXXF: $2.25)
Brand notoriety: BXLC and FFXXF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BXLC: 57% vs. FFXXF: 29%
Market capitalization -- BXLC: $25.46M vs. FFXXF: $294.61M
BXLC [@Investment Managers] is valued at $25.46M. FFXXF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $294.61M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BXLC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFFXXF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BXLC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FFXXF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BXLC is a better buy in the long-term than FFXXF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BXLC’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FFXXF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BXLC’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • FFXXF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FFXXF is a better buy in the short-term than BXLC.

Price Growth

BXLC (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FFXXF (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

BXLC is expected to report earnings on Nov 18, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.49% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FFXXF($295M) has a higher market cap than BXLC($25.5M). FFXXF YTD gains are higher at: 10.294 vs. BXLC (0.000). BXLC has higher revenues than FFXXF: BXLC (1.02M) vs FFXXF (-19.58M).
BXLCFFXXFBXLC / FFXXF
Capitalization25.5M295M9%
EBITDA-2.84MN/A-
Gain YTD0.00010.294-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.02M-19.58M-5%
Total Cash30.3MN/A-
Total DebtN/A99.4M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BXLC vs FFXXF: Fundamental Ratings
BXLC
FFXXF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
13100
SMR RATING
1..100
395
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4684
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5655
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BXLC's Valuation (53) in the null industry is in the same range as FFXXF (60). This means that BXLC’s stock grew similarly to FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

BXLC's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFXXF (100). This means that BXLC’s stock grew significantly faster than FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

BXLC's SMR Rating (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FFXXF (95). This means that BXLC’s stock grew significantly faster than FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

BXLC's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FFXXF (84). This means that BXLC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FFXXF’s over the last 12 months.

FFXXF's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as BXLC (56). This means that FFXXF’s stock grew similarly to BXLC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BXLCFFXXF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
30%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
28%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
19%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
27%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BXLC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FFXXF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSUS82.480.82
+1.00%
Goldman Sachs MarketBeta US Equity ETF
PTMC38.330.22
+0.58%
Pacer Trendpilot™ US Mid Cap ETF
GHYB44.940.06
+0.13%
Goldman Sachs Access Hi Yld Corp Bd ETF
OCEN20.31N/A
N/A
NYLI Clean Oceans ETF
YCL20.55-0.23
-1.11%
ProShares Ultra Yen

BXLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BXLC has been loosely correlated with IDTVF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BXLC jumps, then IDTVF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BXLC
1D Price
Change %
BXLC100%
N/A
IDTVF - BXLC
47%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CEVIY - BXLC
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFXDF - BXLC
10%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
MGLD - BXLC
6%
Poorly correlated
-1.16%
CYMBF - BXLC
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FFXXF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FFXXF and CNDCF have been poorly correlated (+-0% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FFXXF and CNDCF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FFXXF
1D Price
Change %
FFXXF100%
N/A
CNDCF - FFXXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEVIY - FFXXF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BXLC - FFXXF
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
DTSRF - FFXXF
-3%
Poorly correlated
+2.02%
EQBBF - FFXXF
-4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More