Ad is loading...
Compare trend and price BYOB vs TMFG
BYOB vs TMFG Comparison
Open Charts BYOB vs TMFG
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BYOB vs TMFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BYOB vs. TMFG commentary
Dec 01, 2023
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BYOB is a Buy and TMFG is a Buy.
SUMMARIES
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for BYOB with price predictions.
OPEN
A.I.dvisor published
a Summary for TMFG with price predictions.
OPEN
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TMFG has more net assets: 422M vs. BYOB (7.52M). BYOB has a higher annual dividend yield than TMFG: BYOB (36.632) vs TMFG (20.228). BYOB was incepted earlier than TMFG: BYOB (5 years) vs TMFG (9 years). BYOB (0.59) has a lower expense ratio than TMFG (0.85). BYOB has a higher turnover TMFG (4.00) vs TMFG (4.00).
| BYOB | TMFG | BYOB / TMFG | |
| Gain YTD | 36.632 | 20.228 | 181% |
| Net Assets | 7.52M | 422M | 2% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.85 | 69% |
| Turnover | 38.00 | 4.00 | 950% |
| Yield | 0.05 | 0.46 | 10% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| BYOB | TMFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 79% | 1 day ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 80% | 1 day ago 88% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 87% | 1 day ago 77% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 86% | 1 day ago 76% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 88% | 8 days ago 80% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 71% | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 88% | 1 day ago 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
BYOB and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BYOB has been closely correlated with PATH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 75% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BYOB jumps, then PATH could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BYOB | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BYOB | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| PATH - BYOB | 75% Closely correlated | -0.50% | ||
| U - BYOB | 74% Closely correlated | -2.80% | ||
| JMIA - BYOB | 74% Closely correlated | -8.47% | ||
| LSPD - BYOB | 73% Closely correlated | -4.26% | ||
| SQ - BYOB | 70% Closely correlated | -0.46% | ||
More | ||||
TMFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TMFG has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TMFG jumps, then BN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TMFG | 100% | -0.12% | ||
| BN - TMFG | 69% Closely correlated | -0.93% | ||
| MSCI - TMFG | 61% Loosely correlated | -1.10% | ||
| MA - TMFG | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.95% | ||
| AMZN - TMFG | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.18% | ||
| TEAM - TMFG | 56% Loosely correlated | -2.36% | ||
More | ||||