Advertisement
BZ vs EEMX
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZ is a Hold and EEMX is a Buy.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZ’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BZ’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
| BZ | EEMX | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 81% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 74% | 4 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 79% | 2 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 77% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| KCCA | 14.65 | 0.06 | +0.42% |
| KraneShares California Carbon Allw ETF | |||
| HAUZ | 22.54 | -0.22 | -0.95% |
| Xtrackers International Real Estate ETF | |||
| GJUN | 36.91 | -0.43 | -1.15% |
| FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Jun | |||
| HSMV | 35.63 | -0.43 | -1.20% |
| First Trust Horizon Managed Vol S/M ETF | |||
| EZU | 59.00 | -1.01 | -1.68% |
| iShares MSCI Eurozone ETF | |||
BZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BZ and UPWK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZ and UPWK's prices will move in lockstep.
EEMX and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EEMX has been loosely correlated with BILI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if EEMX jumps, then BILI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EEMX | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EEMX | 100% | -1.62% | ||
| BILI - EEMX | 62% Loosely correlated | -3.47% | ||
| BIDU - EEMX | 61% Loosely correlated | -2.06% | ||
| BZUN - EEMX | 60% Loosely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| BZ - EEMX | 59% Loosely correlated | -3.13% | ||
| IQ - EEMX | 58% Loosely correlated | -5.46% | ||
More | ||||