BZ vs LDEM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZ is a StrongSell and LDEM is a Sell.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
| BZ | LDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 69% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 85% | 7 days ago 80% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% | 3 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 74% | 13 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 80% | 3 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 77% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FIBR | 87.09 | N/A | N/A |
| iShares U.S. Fixed Inc Bal Rsk Sysmc ETF | |||
| LDUR | 95.09 | -0.02 | -0.02% |
| PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF | |||
| EET | 52.67 | -0.05 | -0.09% |
| ProShares Ultra MSCI Emerging Markets | |||
| FVD | 45.32 | -0.16 | -0.35% |
| First Trust Value Line® Dividend ETF | |||
| RTH | 222.56 | -3.19 | -1.41% |
| VanEck Retail ETF | |||
BZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BZ and UPWK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZ and UPWK's prices will move in lockstep.
LDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LDEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LDEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LDEM | 100% | -0.58% | ||
| BABA - LDEM | 76% Closely correlated | -2.20% | ||
| BIDU - LDEM | 68% Closely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| BZUN - LDEM | 63% Loosely correlated | -2.41% | ||
| BZ - LDEM | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.37% | ||
| NIO - LDEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +1.35% | ||
More | ||||