BZ vs LDEM
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BZ is a Hold and LDEM is a StrongBuy.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BZ’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- BZ’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
| BZ | LDEM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% | 2 days ago 69% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 80% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 84% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 80% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 77% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 72% | 10 days ago 76% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 79% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 87% | 2 days ago 83% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| PJECX | 15.48 | N/A | N/A |
| PGIM US Real Estate C | |||
| TECHX | 20.32 | -0.08 | -0.40% |
| WisdomTree Technology and Inn 100 DgtN/A | |||
| EIVIX | 13.74 | -0.10 | -0.72% |
| Allspring Special Large Cap Value Inst | |||
| VILSX | 40.46 | -0.33 | -0.81% |
| Value Line Select Growth Institutional | |||
| FSSZX | 38.84 | -0.54 | -1.37% |
| Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp Z | |||
BZ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BZ and UPWK have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BZ and UPWK's prices will move in lockstep.
LDEM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LDEM has been closely correlated with BABA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LDEM jumps, then BABA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LDEM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LDEM | 100% | -0.69% | ||
| BABA - LDEM | 76% Closely correlated | +1.27% | ||
| BIDU - LDEM | 68% Closely correlated | +2.08% | ||
| BZUN - LDEM | 63% Loosely correlated | -14.86% | ||
| BZ - LDEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.72% | ||
| NIO - LDEM | 60% Loosely correlated | +2.71% | ||
More | ||||