Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CADOX vs FJMNX
CADOX vs FJMNX Comparison
Open Charts CADOX vs FJMNX
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt Inst2
Price$18.85
Change-$0.03 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets464.8M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond A
Price$10.40
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets650.28M
CADOX vs FJMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CADOX vs. FJMNX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CADOX is a Hold and FJMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FJMNX has more cash in the bank: 650M vs. CADOX (465M). FJMNX (3.62) and CADOX (3.55) have matching dividends . CADOX was incepted earlier than FJMNX: CADOX (12 years) vs FJMNX (37 years). FJMNX (0.79) is less costly to investors than CADOX (0.56). FJMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. CADOX (10.00). CADOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FJMNX: CADOX (0) vs FJMNX (2500). FJMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.25 vs. CADOX (-2.10). FJMNX return over 5 years is better than : -1.09 vs. CADOX (-3.33).
| CADOX | FJMNX | CADOX / FJMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.79 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.79 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.402 | -1.045 | 134% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 465M | 650M | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 3.62 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.10 | -1.25 | 168% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.99 | 4.01 | 75% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.33 | -1.09 | 306% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.88 | 18.23 | 76% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers