Ad is loading...
CADOX vs FJMNX
CADOX vs FJMNX Comparison
Open Charts CADOX vs FJMNX
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt Inst2
Price$18.92
Change+$0.02 (+0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets472.86M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond A
Price$10.46
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets653.16M
CADOX vs FJMNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CADOX vs. FJMNX commentary
May 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CADOX is a Hold and FJMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FJMNX has more cash in the bank: 653M vs. CADOX (473M). FJMNX (3.59) and CADOX (3.49) have matching dividends . CADOX was incepted earlier than FJMNX: CADOX (11 years) vs FJMNX (37 years). FJMNX (0.79) is less costly to investors than CADOX (0.56). FJMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. CADOX (10.00). CADOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FJMNX: CADOX (0) vs FJMNX (2500). CADOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.16 vs. FJMNX (0.87). FJMNX return over 5 years is better than : 3.57 vs. CADOX (1.52).
| CADOX | FJMNX | CADOX / FJMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.79 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.79 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.871 | -1.457 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 473M | 653M | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.49 | 3.59 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.16 | 0.87 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.31 | 6.89 | 92% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.52 | 3.57 | 43% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.85 | 18.77 | 79% |