Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CADOX vs FJMNX
CADOX vs FJMNX Comparison
Open Charts CADOX vs FJMNX
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt Inst2
Price$18.90
Change+$0.04 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets471.83M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond A
Price$10.45
Change+$0.02 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets645.55M
CADOX vs FJMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CADOX vs. FJMNX commentary
Jul 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CADOX is a Hold and FJMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FJMNX has more cash in the bank: 646M vs. CADOX (472M). FJMNX (3.61) and CADOX (3.52) have matching dividends . CADOX was incepted earlier than FJMNX: CADOX (12 years) vs FJMNX (37 years). FJMNX (0.79) is less costly to investors than CADOX (0.56). FJMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. CADOX (10.00). CADOX has a lower initial minimum investment than FJMNX: CADOX (0) vs FJMNX (2500). FJMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.31 vs. CADOX (-0.47). FJMNX return over 5 years is better than : 0.75 vs. CADOX (-1.70).
| CADOX | FJMNX | CADOX / FJMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.79 | 71% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 0.79 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 37 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.089 | -1.247 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 472M | 646M | 73% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.52 | 3.61 | 97% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.47 | 0.31 | -155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.02 | 6.03 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.70 | 0.75 | -228% |
| Returns for 10 years | 14.08 | 19.17 | 73% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement