Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CADOX vs NTCCX
CADOX vs NTCCX Comparison
Open Charts CADOX vs NTCCX
Columbia Minnesota Tax-Exempt Inst2
Price$18.85
Change-$0.03 (-0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets464.8M
Nuveen Minnesota Municipal Bond C
Price$10.39
Change-$0.02 (-0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets650.28M
CADOX vs NTCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CADOX vs. NTCCX commentary
Aug 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CADOX is a Hold and NTCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NTCCX has more cash in the bank: 650M vs. CADOX (465M). CADOX pays higher dividends than NTCCX: CADOX (3.55) vs NTCCX (2.79). CADOX was incepted earlier than NTCCX: CADOX (12 years) vs NTCCX (11 years). NTCCX (1.59) is less costly to investors than CADOX (0.56). NTCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 26.00 vs. CADOX (10.00). CADOX has a lower initial minimum investment than NTCCX: CADOX (0) vs NTCCX (2500). NTCCX (-2.05) and CADOX (-2.10) have marching annual gain over last year. CADOX return over 5 years is better than : -3.33 vs. NTCCX (-5.01).
| CADOX | NTCCX | CADOX / NTCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.59 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.56 | 1.59 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.402 | -1.511 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 465M | 650M | 72% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.55 | 2.79 | 127% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.10 | -2.05 | 102% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.99 | 1.52 | 197% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.33 | -5.01 | 66% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.88 | 9.95 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers