Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CAEAX vs FHJUX
CAEAX vs FHJUX Comparison
Open Charts CAEAX vs FHJUX
Columbia Acorn European A
Price$27.83
Change-$0.28 (-1.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets39.94M
Fidelity Advisor Europe A
Price$43.03
Change-$0.13 (-0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets826.03M
CAEAX vs FHJUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CAEAX vs. FHJUX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAEAX is a Buy and FHJUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHJUX has more cash in the bank: 826M vs. CAEAX (39.9M). FHJUX pays higher dividends than CAEAX: FHJUX (2.40) vs CAEAX (2.08). CAEAX was incepted earlier than FHJUX: CAEAX (14 years) vs FHJUX (11 years). CAEAX (1.61) is less costly to investors than FHJUX (0.92). CAEAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FHJUX (31.00). CAEAX (6%) and FHJUX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FHJUX has a lower initial minimum investment than CAEAX: FHJUX (0) vs CAEAX (2000). FHJUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.68 vs. CAEAX (10.33). CAEAX (36.57) and FHJUX (35.96) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CAEAX | FHJUX | CAEAX / FHJUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.31 | 0.92 | 142% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.61 | 0.92 | 175% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 17.763 | 24.380 | 73% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 39.9M | 826M | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.08 | 2.40 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.33 | 17.68 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 26.09 | 42.84 | 61% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.57 | 35.96 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 89.01 | 20.68 | 430% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers