Ad is loading...
CAEAX vs FHJUX
CAEAX vs FHJUX Comparison
Open Charts CAEAX vs FHJUX
Columbia Acorn European A
Price$21.94
Change+$0.22 (+1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets34.17M
Fidelity Advisor Europe A
Price$34.91
Change+$0.05 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets686.54M
CAEAX vs FHJUX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CAEAX vs. FHJUX commentary
Apr 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAEAX is a Buy and FHJUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHJUX has more cash in the bank: 687M vs. CAEAX (34.2M). FHJUX pays higher dividends than CAEAX: FHJUX (2.67) vs CAEAX (2.40). CAEAX was incepted earlier than FHJUX: CAEAX (14 years) vs FHJUX (11 years). CAEAX (1.92) is less costly to investors than FHJUX (0.92). FHJUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. CAEAX (23.00). CAEAX (6%) and FHJUX (6%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FHJUX has a lower initial minimum investment than CAEAX: FHJUX (0) vs CAEAX (2000). FHJUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -2.94 vs. CAEAX (-13.01). CAEAX return over 5 years is better than : 30.42 vs. FHJUX (28.20).
| CAEAX | FHJUX | CAEAX / FHJUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.45 | 0.92 | 158% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.92 | 0.92 | 209% |
| Fund Existence | 14 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.007 | 0.461 | -1,953% |
| Front Load | 6% | 6% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 34.2M | 687M | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.40 | 2.67 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.01 | -2.94 | 442% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.45 | 6.82 | -182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.42 | 28.20 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.04 | -1.38 | -3,484% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers