Advertisement
CAG vs GIS
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Conagra Brands (CAG) vs. General Mills (GIS) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both CAG and GIS have faced headwinds in recent market activity, with shares declining amid softer consumer demand in packaged foods.
- CAG offers a higher dividend yield of nearly 10%, compared to GIS's 7%, appealing to income-focused investors.
- GIS boasts a larger market capitalization ($18.5B vs. $6.7B for CAG) and positive trailing twelve months (TTM) EPS of $4.09, signaling greater scale and profitability.
- Recent earnings for both missed expectations slightly, with volume pressures and pricing challenges influencing sentiment in the consumer staples sector.
- Analyst price targets suggest modest upside for both, with GIS at $40.58 and CAG at $16.22 from current levels.
Introduction
Conagra Brands (CAG) and General Mills (GIS) are leading players in the consumer packaged goods sector, focusing on branded frozen foods, snacks, and pantry staples. This stock comparison examines their recent performance amid shifting consumer preferences toward value options and health-conscious choices. Traders seeking relative value in defensive staples and long-term investors eyeing dividend stability will find insights into momentum, valuations, and sector risks particularly relevant in today's volatile market environment.
CAG Overview and Recent Performance
Conagra Brands (CAG) produces a wide array of branded foods, including frozen meals (e.g., Healthy Choice), snacks (Slim Jim), and grocery items under brands like Hunt's and Orville Redenbacher's. In recent weeks, CAG shares have traded around $14, near the 52-week low of $13.86, reflecting a steep decline of over 40% in the past year. The stock's price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio stands at 10.06 (trailing), with a TTM EPS of -$0.10, pressured by volume declines and input cost inflation. Third-quarter fiscal 2026 earnings, released in early April, showed revenue of $2.79 billion (a slight beat) but EPS of $0.39 (narrow miss), leading to an 8.7% share drop since. A new CEO appointment in mid-April added to leadership transition sentiment, while high dividend yield (9.96%) supports income appeal amid broader sector weakness from private-label competition and GLP-1 drug impacts on snacking.
GIS Overview and Recent Performance
General Mills (GIS) is a diversified food giant with iconic brands in cereals (Cheerios), yogurt (Yoplait), snacks (Nature Valley), and baking products (Pillsbury). Shares have hovered near $35 in recent market activity, with a 52-week range of $34.04 to $55.46 and a P/E ratio of 8.49. TTM EPS remains positive at $4.09, underscoring operational resilience despite challenges. Fiscal 2026 third-quarter results in mid-March reported net sales down 8% to $4.4 billion and adjusted EPS of $0.64 (below estimates), driven by pricing actions and organic sales declines of 3%. Sentiment reflects ongoing consumer pullback on branded goods, competition from cheaper alternatives, and supply chain hurdles, though a 7.03% dividend yield and year-to-date gains provide relative stability.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases 25 top-performing AI trading bots curated from over 350 available models that trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots stand out in current market conditions due to robust stats like annualized returns from +23% to +163%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.70, with average trade durations from minutes to weeks and drawdowns managed effectively (profit-to-drawdown ratios 2.6 to 17). Employing diverse strategies—such as pattern recognition in semiconductors (e.g., NVDA), leveraged ETFs, or energy sectors—they adapt to volatility, inflation, and growth trends. Explore these bots for potential edges in dynamic markets like the one affecting staples stocks.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Both CAG and GIS operate in the consumer staples sector, relying on branded shelf-stable and frozen products, but GIS has broader diversification into yogurt and pet food, reducing single-category risks compared to CAG's heavier snack and frozen focus. Growth drivers include pricing discipline and innovation, yet both grapple with volume erosion from private labels and health trends like GLP-1 medications curbing impulse buys. Recent momentum favors neither decisively, with CAG more volatile (8.5% vs. 5.8%) and down sharply past year, while GIS shows steadier positioning. Risk factors overlap in input costs and consumer frugality, but GIS's scale offers better margin buffers. Market sentiment tilts toward GIS for its positive EPS and higher analyst conviction.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron's AI models currently lean toward GIS over CAG, citing superior trend consistency, positive profitability metrics, larger scale for weathering downturns, and relatively stronger year-to-date positioning amid sector pressures. While CAG's elevated yield attracts yield chasers, GIS edges out on stability and catalyst potential from diversification.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAG is a StrongBuy and GIS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGIS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CAG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- GIS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAG’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GIS’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CAG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- GIS’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
Price Growth
CAG (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +5.61% price change this week, while GIS (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was +4.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.68%.
Reported Earning Dates
CAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.
GIS is expected to report earnings on Jul 01, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (+2.21% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
| CAG | GIS | CAG / GIS | |
| Capitalization | 6.57B | 18.4B | 36% |
| EBITDA | 938M | 4.12B | 23% |
| Gain YTD | -17.017 | -23.469 | 73% |
| P/E Ratio | 10.12 | 8.44 | 120% |
| Revenue | 11.2B | 18.4B | 61% |
| Total Cash | 55.1M | 786M | 7% |
| Total Debt | 7.33B | 14B | 52% |
CAG | GIS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | 5 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 8 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 92 | 40 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 62 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 97 | 81 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAG's Valuation (5) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as GIS (8). This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to GIS’s over the last 12 months.
CAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as GIS (100). This means that CAG’s stock grew similarly to GIS’s over the last 12 months.
GIS's SMR Rating (40) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAG (92). This means that GIS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAG’s over the last 12 months.
GIS's Price Growth Rating (62) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CAG (63). This means that GIS’s stock grew similarly to CAG’s over the last 12 months.
GIS's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as CAG (97). This means that GIS’s stock grew similarly to CAG’s over the last 12 months.
| CAG | GIS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 39% | 3 days ago 36% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 56% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 40% | 3 days ago 36% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 43% | 3 days ago 46% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 47% | 3 days ago 43% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 47% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 46% | 5 days ago 49% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 61% | 12 days ago 57% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 53% | 3 days ago 48% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 62% |
Advertisement
CAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAG has been closely correlated with GIS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAG jumps, then GIS could also see price increases.
GIS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GIS has been closely correlated with CAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if GIS jumps, then CAG could also see price increases.