It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLAKE’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LAKE’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CAL (@Apparel/Footwear Retail) experienced а +0.13% price change this week, while LAKE (@Apparel/Footwear) price change was +9.13% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear Retail industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.82%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Apparel/Footwear industry was -0.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.44%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.86%.
CAL is expected to report earnings on Mar 18, 2025.
LAKE is expected to report earnings on Apr 10, 2025.
Companies in the apparel and/or footwear retail industry sell clothing, accessories and footwear, for different age groups and genders. The industry’s product categories could range from basics, such as underwear, to luxury items. Some retailers source items from wholesalers or an apparel brand to sell in their stores; some others are licensed to make and market their own retail goods under particular brands. Several companies outsource production of clothing to developing/emerging economies where labor costs are relatively inexpensive. Apparel retail is often influenced by fashion trends, and many companies feel the need to adapt to what’s “in vogue” to retain customers and attract new ones. A major disruption in this industry has been the burgeoning trend in digital shopping – to compete with rapidly growing e-commerce, even traditional retail players are upping the ante on their online platforms. Much of the products’ performance in apparel/footwear retail is cyclical, i.e., economic boom times encourage consumer spending, while recessions induce thriftiness among people. Some large-cap U.S. apparel/footwear retail companies include TJX Companies Inc., Ross Stores, Inc., Lululemon Athletica Inc. and Burlington Stores, Inc.
@Apparel/Footwear (-0.12% weekly)Apparel/footwear might be slightly more ‘cyclical’ in the largely non-cyclical category of non-durables. While digital giants like Amazon have been rapidly expanding their presence, traditional clothing/footwear retailers have also been bulking up their online presence in recent years, to milk the burgeoning trend of online shopping among consumers across the globe. The apparel and footwear retail market was valued at around $ 360 billion in 2018, and this figure was expected to reach about $386 billion by 2020 (according to a Statista report). NIKE, Inc, V.F. Corporation and Under Armour, Inc. are some of the companies with the largest U.S. stock market caps in this segment.
CAL | LAKE | CAL / LAKE | |
Capitalization | 1.46B | 132M | 1,104% |
EBITDA | 248M | 11M | 2,255% |
Gain YTD | -0.266 | 19.363 | -1% |
P/E Ratio | 9.21 | 20.60 | 45% |
Revenue | 2.82B | 122M | 2,309% |
Total Cash | N/A | 4.85M | - |
Total Debt | 786M | 10.7M | 7,346% |
CAL | LAKE | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 60 | 3 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 31 Undervalued | 58 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 56 | 66 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 38 | 88 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | 50 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 71 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CAL's Valuation (31) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as LAKE (58) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CAL’s stock grew similarly to LAKE’s over the last 12 months.
CAL's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is in the same range as LAKE (66) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CAL’s stock grew similarly to LAKE’s over the last 12 months.
CAL's SMR Rating (38) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LAKE (88) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that CAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than LAKE’s over the last 12 months.
LAKE's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as CAL (63) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that LAKE’s stock grew similarly to CAL’s over the last 12 months.
LAKE's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Industrial Specialties industry is significantly better than the same rating for CAL (71) in the Apparel Or Footwear industry. This means that LAKE’s stock grew significantly faster than CAL’s over the last 12 months.
CAL | LAKE | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago81% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago76% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago79% | 2 days ago71% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago82% | 2 days ago78% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago71% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago80% | 2 days ago69% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 11 days ago79% | 4 days ago68% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago77% | 12 days ago68% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago71% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago76% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAL has been closely correlated with DBI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAL jumps, then DBI could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CAL | 100% | +2.39% | ||
DBI - CAL | 67% Closely correlated | +4.94% | ||
SCVL - CAL | 59% Loosely correlated | +1.11% | ||
SHOO - CAL | 58% Loosely correlated | +2.96% | ||
OXM - CAL | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.12% | ||
KTB - CAL | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that LAKE and GIII have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LAKE and GIII's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LAKE | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LAKE | 100% | +4.02% | ||
GIII - LAKE | 30% Poorly correlated | +2.31% | ||
CAL - LAKE | 29% Poorly correlated | +2.39% | ||
UA - LAKE | 29% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
OXM - LAKE | 28% Poorly correlated | +2.12% | ||
UAA - LAKE | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.32% | ||
More |