CAMLF
Price
$1.91
Change
-$0.02 (-1.04%)
Updated
Dec 31 closing price
Capitalization
637.37M
JNDAF
Price
$0.14
Change
-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
70.32M
Ad is loading...

CAMLF vs JNDAF

Header iconCAMLF vs JNDAF Comparison
Open Charts CAMLF vs JNDAFBanner chart's image
Central Asia Metals Ltd, London
Price$1.91
Change-$0.02 (-1.04%)
Volume$2K
Capitalization637.37M
Jindalee Lithium
Price$0.14
Change-$0.01 (-6.67%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization70.32M
CAMLF vs JNDAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
JNDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAMLF vs. JNDAF commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAMLF is a Hold and JNDAF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (CAMLF: $1.91 vs. JNDAF: $0.14)
Brand notoriety: CAMLF and JNDAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAMLF: 109% vs. JNDAF: 74%
Market capitalization -- CAMLF: $637.37M vs. JNDAF: $70.32M
CAMLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $637.37M. JNDAF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $70.32M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAMLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileJNDAF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CAMLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • JNDAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAMLF is a better buy in the long-term than JNDAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

JNDAF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • JNDAF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

CAMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while JNDAF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +14.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.96%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.34% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAMLF($637M) has a higher market cap than JNDAF($70.3M). JNDAF has higher P/E ratio than CAMLF: JNDAF (108.70) vs CAMLF (4.41). JNDAF YTD gains are higher at: 3.108 vs. CAMLF (0.000). CAMLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 166M vs. JNDAF (-3.59M). CAMLF has more cash in the bank: 51M vs. JNDAF (1.15M). JNDAF has less debt than CAMLF: JNDAF (138K) vs CAMLF (12.6M). CAMLF has higher revenues than JNDAF: CAMLF (236M) vs JNDAF (255K).
CAMLFJNDAFCAMLF / JNDAF
Capitalization637M70.3M906%
EBITDA166M-3.59M-4,629%
Gain YTD0.0003.108-
P/E Ratio4.41108.704%
Revenue236M255K92,549%
Total Cash51M1.15M4,450%
Total Debt12.6M138K9,130%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAMLFJNDAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
46%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
73%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
12%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
82%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
JNDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RGT.X0.201205N/A
N/A
Rari Governance Token cryptocurrency
JST.X0.039166-0.001729
-4.23%
JUST cryptocurrency
AAVE.X315.691070-19.643738
-5.86%
Aave cryptocurrency
MLN.X17.464552-1.900150
-9.81%
Enzyme cryptocurrency
MAGIC.X0.435333-0.056004
-11.40%
Treasure cryptocurrency

CAMLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAMLF has been loosely correlated with DWMNF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 50% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAMLF jumps, then DWMNF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAMLF
1D Price
Change %
CAMLF100%
N/A
DWMNF - CAMLF
50%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ANLDF - CAMLF
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
ANFGF - CAMLF
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
NFUNF - CAMLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.85%
JNDAF - CAMLF
16%
Poorly correlated
-6.91%
More