CANC vs NTLA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CANC is a StrongBuy and NTLA is a Buy.
NTLA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 6 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 50 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 86 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CANC | NTLA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | 4 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 71% | 4 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 79% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 87% | 4 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 88% | 13 days ago 87% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 81% | 4 days ago 84% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 90% | 4 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GTDCX | 32.96 | 0.19 | +0.58% |
| Invesco EQV Emerging Markets All Cap C | |||
| SROCX | 11.66 | 0.06 | +0.52% |
| Calamos Antetokounmpo Sustainable Eqs C | |||
| EXHAX | 24.32 | 0.10 | +0.41% |
| Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Max Term S | |||
| FCDIX | 33.50 | N/A | N/A |
| Fidelity Advisor Stock Selector Sm Cp I | |||
| DHPIX | 16.01 | -0.02 | -0.12% |
| Diamond Hill Mid Cap I | |||
CANC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CANC has been closely correlated with NTLA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CANC jumps, then NTLA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CANC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CANC | 100% | -2.00% | ||
| NTLA - CANC | 76% Closely correlated | +1.59% | ||
| SDGR - CANC | 63% Loosely correlated | +1.22% | ||
| RLAY - CANC | 61% Loosely correlated | +0.31% | ||
| ACLX - CANC | 61% Loosely correlated | -0.41% | ||
| ILMN - CANC | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.34% | ||
More | ||||
NTLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTLA has been closely correlated with VCYT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTLA jumps, then VCYT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTLA | 100% | +1.59% | ||
| VCYT - NTLA | 69% Closely correlated | +0.28% | ||
| CRSP - NTLA | 66% Loosely correlated | -2.15% | ||
| BEAM - NTLA | 64% Loosely correlated | -3.22% | ||
| RXRX - NTLA | 60% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
| RCKT - NTLA | 59% Loosely correlated | -2.69% | ||
More | ||||