CANC vs NTLA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CANC is a Sell and NTLA is a StrongSell.
NTLA | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 33 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| CANC | NTLA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 86% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 89% | 3 days ago 82% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 90% | 3 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 78% | 3 days ago 87% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 82% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 82% | 7 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 85% | 3 days ago 86% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 83% | 3 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 90% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QTERX | 10.74 | -0.02 | -0.19% |
| AQR Emerging Multi-Style II R6 | |||
| ACVIX | 11.62 | -0.08 | -0.68% |
| American Century Small Cap Value I | |||
| GSMVX | 17.52 | -0.16 | -0.90% |
| Goldman Sachs Small/Mid Cap Value Instl | |||
| USAWX | 31.56 | -0.32 | -1.00% |
| Victory Sustainable World | |||
| SAPEX | 17.95 | -0.19 | -1.05% |
| Spectrum Active Advantage Investor | |||
CANC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CANC has been closely correlated with NTLA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CANC jumps, then NTLA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CANC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CANC | 100% | -4.04% | ||
| NTLA - CANC | 76% Closely correlated | -7.61% | ||
| SDGR - CANC | 63% Loosely correlated | -8.98% | ||
| RLAY - CANC | 61% Loosely correlated | -8.84% | ||
| ACLX - CANC | 61% Loosely correlated | -7.63% | ||
| ILMN - CANC | 59% Loosely correlated | -5.05% | ||
More | ||||
NTLA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NTLA has been closely correlated with VCYT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NTLA jumps, then VCYT could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To NTLA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NTLA | 100% | -7.61% | ||
| VCYT - NTLA | 69% Closely correlated | -2.97% | ||
| EDIT - NTLA | 68% Closely correlated | -3.97% | ||
| BEAM - NTLA | 67% Closely correlated | -8.59% | ||
| CRSP - NTLA | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| PRME - NTLA | 58% Loosely correlated | -6.95% | ||
More | ||||