CANG
Price
$4.99
Change
-$0.18 (-3.48%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
204.82M
37 days until earnings call
KIRK
Price
$1.49
Change
-$0.08 (-5.10%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
31.15M
40 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CANG vs KIRK

Header iconCANG vs KIRK Comparison
Open Charts CANG vs KIRKBanner chart's image
Cango
Price$4.99
Change-$0.18 (-3.48%)
Volume$435.6K
Capitalization204.82M
Kirkland's
Price$1.49
Change-$0.08 (-5.10%)
Volume$281.8K
Capitalization31.15M
CANG vs KIRK Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KIRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CANG vs. KIRK commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CANG is a Hold and KIRK is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (CANG: $4.98 vs. KIRK: $1.49)
Brand notoriety: CANG and KIRK are both not notable
Both companies represent the Specialty Stores industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CANG: 70% vs. KIRK: 82%
Market capitalization -- CANG: $204.82M vs. KIRK: $31.15M
CANG [@Specialty Stores] is valued at $204.82M. KIRK’s [@Specialty Stores] market capitalization is $31.15M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Specialty Stores] industry ranges from $380.15B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Specialty Stores] industry is $8.39B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CANG’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKIRK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CANG’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KIRK’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CANG is a better buy in the long-term than KIRK.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CANG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KIRK’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CANG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • KIRK’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CANG and KIRK are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CANG (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -6.39% price change this week, while KIRK (@Specialty Stores) price change was +24.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +4.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

CANG is expected to report earnings on Dec 01, 2025.

KIRK is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Specialty Stores (+4.50% weekly)

The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CANG($205M) has a higher market cap than KIRK($31.1M). CANG has higher P/E ratio than KIRK: CANG (20.92) vs KIRK (4.79). CANG YTD gains are higher at: 13.182 vs. KIRK (-8.025). KIRK has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -23.85M vs. CANG (-248.35M). CANG has more cash in the bank: 2.65B vs. KIRK (4.89M). KIRK has less debt than CANG: KIRK (198M) vs CANG (431M). CANG has higher revenues than KIRK: CANG (2.12B) vs KIRK (480M).
CANGKIRKCANG / KIRK
Capitalization205M31.1M659%
EBITDA-248.35M-23.85M1,041%
Gain YTD13.182-8.025-164%
P/E Ratio20.924.79437%
Revenue2.12B480M442%
Total Cash2.65B4.89M54,090%
Total Debt431M198M218%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CANG vs KIRK: Fundamental Ratings
CANG
KIRK
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5914
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
44
Fair valued
50
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
67100
SMR RATING
1..100
89100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3997
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
503

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CANG's Valuation (44) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as KIRK (50) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to KIRK’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KIRK (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than KIRK’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's SMR Rating (89) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as KIRK (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to KIRK’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Packaged Software industry is in the same range as KIRK (40) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew similarly to KIRK’s over the last 12 months.

CANG's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Packaged Software industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KIRK (97) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that CANG’s stock grew somewhat faster than KIRK’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CANGKIRK
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CANG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KIRK
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
QEPC39.800.30
+0.76%
Q.E.P. Co., Inc.
RGEDF27.17N/A
N/A
Gedeon Richter Ltd
MDIKF18.29N/A
N/A
Modec Inc.
FNTTF0.26N/A
N/A
XR IMMERSIVE TECH INC.
TSCDY17.35-0.04
-0.23%
Tesco PLC

CANG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CANG and ANCTF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CANG and ANCTF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CANG
1D Price
Change %
CANG100%
-3.68%
ANCTF - CANG
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.40%
KIRK - CANG
23%
Poorly correlated
-5.10%
RH - CANG
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
WSM - CANG
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.65%
WINA - CANG
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.75%
More

KIRK and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KIRK has been loosely correlated with FLWS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KIRK jumps, then FLWS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KIRK
1D Price
Change %
KIRK100%
-5.10%
FLWS - KIRK
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.92%
RH - KIRK
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
HZO - KIRK
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
HNST - KIRK
35%
Loosely correlated
+7.84%
LE - KIRK
33%
Loosely correlated
-0.31%
More