CAOVY
Price
$8.66
Change
-$0.26 (-2.91%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
25.77B
HLPPY
Price
$4.82
Change
-$0.07 (-1.43%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.98B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAOVY vs HLPPY

Header iconCAOVY vs HLPPY Comparison
Open Charts CAOVY vs HLPPYBanner chart's image
China Overseas Land & Investment
Price$8.66
Change-$0.26 (-2.91%)
Volume$15.72K
Capitalization25.77B
Hang Lung Properties
Price$4.82
Change-$0.07 (-1.43%)
Volume$2.96K
Capitalization6.98B
CAOVY vs HLPPY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAOVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLPPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAOVY vs. HLPPY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAOVY is a Hold and HLPPY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (CAOVY: $8.66 vs. HLPPY: $4.82)
Brand notoriety: CAOVY and HLPPY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAOVY: 305% vs. HLPPY: 19%
Market capitalization -- CAOVY: $25.77B vs. HLPPY: $6.98B
CAOVY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $25.77B. HLPPY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $6.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAOVY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileHLPPY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAOVY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • HLPPY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAOVY is a better buy in the long-term than HLPPY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAOVY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLPPY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAOVY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • HLPPY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAOVY is a better buy in the short-term than HLPPY.

Price Growth

CAOVY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -7.79% price change this week, while HLPPY (@Real Estate Development) price change was +1.26% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.93%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.17%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAOVY is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.

HLPPY is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.33% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAOVY($25.8B) has a higher market cap than HLPPY($6.98B). HLPPY has higher P/E ratio than CAOVY: HLPPY (11.82) vs CAOVY (7.92). HLPPY YTD gains are higher at: 31.619 vs. CAOVY (15.711). CAOVY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 37.7B vs. HLPPY (6.37B). CAOVY has higher revenues than HLPPY: CAOVY (180B) vs HLPPY (10.3B).
CAOVYHLPPYCAOVY / HLPPY
Capitalization25.8B6.98B370%
EBITDA37.7B6.37B592%
Gain YTD15.71131.61950%
P/E Ratio7.9211.8267%
Revenue180B10.3B1,748%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAOVY vs HLPPY: Fundamental Ratings
CAOVY
HLPPY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
1299
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5239
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
169
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HLPPY's Valuation (13) in the null industry is in the same range as CAOVY (22). This means that HLPPY’s stock grew similarly to CAOVY’s over the last 12 months.

HLPPY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CAOVY (100). This means that HLPPY’s stock grew similarly to CAOVY’s over the last 12 months.

CAOVY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for HLPPY (99). This means that CAOVY’s stock grew significantly faster than HLPPY’s over the last 12 months.

HLPPY's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as CAOVY (52). This means that HLPPY’s stock grew similarly to CAOVY’s over the last 12 months.

HLPPY's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the null industry is in the same range as CAOVY (16). This means that HLPPY’s stock grew similarly to CAOVY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAOVYHLPPY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 17 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAOVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HLPPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SN107.240.88
+0.83%
SharkNinja
KUKE3.000.02
+0.64%
Kuke Music Holding Limited
AGNCN25.300.04
+0.16%
AGNC Investment Corp
SWBI8.90-0.04
-0.45%
Smith & Wesson Brands
TDS35.59-0.28
-0.78%
Telephone and Data Systems

CAOVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAOVY has been closely correlated with LGFRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAOVY jumps, then LGFRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAOVY
1D Price
Change %
CAOVY100%
-2.91%
LGFRY - CAOVY
70%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
HLPPY - CAOVY
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
BEKE - CAOVY
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
SUHJY - CAOVY
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
HLDCY - CAOVY
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
More

HLPPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLPPY has been closely correlated with LGFRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HLPPY jumps, then LGFRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HLPPY
1D Price
Change %
HLPPY100%
-1.43%
LGFRY - HLPPY
70%
Closely correlated
-0.37%
SUHJY - HLPPY
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
CAOVY - HLPPY
61%
Loosely correlated
-2.91%
HLDCY - HLPPY
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
BEKE - HLPPY
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
More