CAOVY
Price
$9.18
Change
+$0.11 (+1.21%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
25.77B
MODVF
Price
$10.35
Change
-$0.04 (-0.38%)
Updated
Jul 11 closing price
Capitalization
268.8M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAOVY vs MODVF

Header iconCAOVY vs MODVF Comparison
Open Charts CAOVY vs MODVFBanner chart's image
China Overseas Land & Investment
Price$9.18
Change+$0.11 (+1.21%)
Volume$1.91K
Capitalization25.77B
Melcor Development
Price$10.35
Change-$0.04 (-0.38%)
Volume$100
Capitalization268.8M
CAOVY vs MODVF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAOVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MODVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAOVY vs. MODVF commentary
Jul 14, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAOVY is a StrongBuy and MODVF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2025
Stock price -- (CAOVY: $8.70 vs. MODVF: $10.35)
Brand notoriety: CAOVY and MODVF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAOVY: 33% vs. MODVF: 12%
Market capitalization -- CAOVY: $25.77B vs. MODVF: $268.8M
CAOVY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $25.77B. MODVF’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $268.8M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAOVY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMODVF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAOVY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MODVF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAOVY is a better buy in the long-term than MODVF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAOVY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MODVF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAOVY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MODVF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CAOVY and MODVF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CAOVY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +0.52% price change this week, while MODVF (@Real Estate Development) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +0.96%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.03%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAOVY is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+0.96% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CAOVY($25.8B) has a higher market cap than MODVF($269M). CAOVY has higher P/E ratio than MODVF: CAOVY (7.92) vs MODVF (4.23). CAOVY (16.312) and MODVF (16.162) have similar YTD gains . CAOVY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 37.7B vs. MODVF (140M). CAOVY has higher revenues than MODVF: CAOVY (180B) vs MODVF (225M).
CAOVYMODVFCAOVY / MODVF
Capitalization25.8B269M9,591%
EBITDA37.7B140M26,929%
Gain YTD16.31216.162101%
P/E Ratio7.924.23187%
Revenue180B225M80,000%
Total CashN/A51.5M-
Total DebtN/A705M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAOVY vs MODVF: Fundamental Ratings
CAOVY
MODVF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4150
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10056
SMR RATING
1..100
1287
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4846
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
113
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a10

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAOVY's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as MODVF (30). This means that CAOVY’s stock grew similarly to MODVF’s over the last 12 months.

MODVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAOVY (100). This means that MODVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAOVY’s over the last 12 months.

CAOVY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MODVF (87). This means that CAOVY’s stock grew significantly faster than MODVF’s over the last 12 months.

MODVF's Price Growth Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as CAOVY (48). This means that MODVF’s stock grew similarly to CAOVY’s over the last 12 months.

MODVF's P/E Growth Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as CAOVY (11). This means that MODVF’s stock grew similarly to CAOVY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAOVYMODVF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
46%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
72%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
40%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAOVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MODVF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ANTSX11.07-0.09
-0.81%
American Century Intl Sm-Md Cp Inv
NOINX16.57-0.14
-0.84%
Northern International Equity Index
FGINX15.99-0.14
-0.87%
Macquarie Growth and Income A
UBPSX14.61-0.14
-0.95%
ProFunds UltraLatin America Svc
BSCMX18.22-0.19
-1.03%
Brandes Small Cap Value I

CAOVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAOVY has been closely correlated with LGFRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAOVY jumps, then LGFRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAOVY
1D Price
Change %
CAOVY100%
-4.08%
LGFRY - CAOVY
70%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
HLPPY - CAOVY
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.89%
BEKE - CAOVY
54%
Loosely correlated
-4.99%
SUHJY - CAOVY
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
HLDCY - CAOVY
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.78%
More

MODVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MODVF has been loosely correlated with HUFAF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MODVF jumps, then HUFAF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MODVF
1D Price
Change %
MODVF100%
-0.38%
HUFAF - MODVF
42%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GZTGF - MODVF
30%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HOUS - MODVF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAOVY - MODVF
22%
Poorly correlated
-4.08%
MHIVF - MODVF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More