CAOVY
Price
$8.49
Change
+$0.40 (+4.94%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
25.77B
SUHJY
Price
$11.85
Change
-$0.13 (-1.09%)
Updated
Aug 5 closing price
Capitalization
36.26B
Interact to see
Advertisement

CAOVY vs SUHJY

Header iconCAOVY vs SUHJY Comparison
Open Charts CAOVY vs SUHJYBanner chart's image
China Overseas Land & Investment
Price$8.49
Change+$0.40 (+4.94%)
Volume$515
Capitalization25.77B
Sun Hung Kai Properties
Price$11.85
Change-$0.13 (-1.09%)
Volume$31.66K
Capitalization36.26B
CAOVY vs SUHJY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CAOVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUHJY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CAOVY vs. SUHJY commentary
Aug 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CAOVY is a StrongBuy and SUHJY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 07, 2025
Stock price -- (CAOVY: $8.49 vs. SUHJY: $11.97)
Brand notoriety: CAOVY and SUHJY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CAOVY: 6% vs. SUHJY: 66%
Market capitalization -- CAOVY: $25.77B vs. SUHJY: $36.26B
CAOVY [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $25.77B. SUHJY’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $36.26B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CAOVY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileSUHJY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CAOVY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • SUHJY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, CAOVY is a better buy in the long-term than SUHJY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CAOVY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SUHJY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CAOVY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SUHJY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAOVY is a better buy in the short-term than SUHJY.

Price Growth

CAOVY (@Real Estate Development) experienced а -9.97% price change this week, while SUHJY (@Real Estate Development) price change was -0.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +4.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.97%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.99%.

Reported Earning Dates

CAOVY is expected to report earnings on Mar 31, 2025.

SUHJY is expected to report earnings on Mar 20, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+4.38% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SUHJY($36.3B) has a higher market cap than CAOVY($25.8B). SUHJY has higher P/E ratio than CAOVY: SUHJY (15.02) vs CAOVY (7.92). SUHJY YTD gains are higher at: 26.175 vs. CAOVY (16.009). CAOVY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 37.7B vs. SUHJY (25.8B). CAOVY has higher revenues than SUHJY: CAOVY (180B) vs SUHJY (65B).
CAOVYSUHJYCAOVY / SUHJY
Capitalization25.8B36.3B71%
EBITDA37.7B25.8B146%
Gain YTD16.00926.17561%
P/E Ratio7.9215.0253%
Revenue180B65B277%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CAOVY vs SUHJY: Fundamental Ratings
CAOVY
SUHJY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2153
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
24
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10067
SMR RATING
1..100
14100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1410
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CAOVY's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as SUHJY (24). This means that CAOVY’s stock grew similarly to SUHJY’s over the last 12 months.

SUHJY's Profit vs Risk Rating (67) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAOVY (100). This means that SUHJY’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAOVY’s over the last 12 months.

CAOVY's SMR Rating (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SUHJY (100). This means that CAOVY’s stock grew significantly faster than SUHJY’s over the last 12 months.

SUHJY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as CAOVY (59). This means that SUHJY’s stock grew similarly to CAOVY’s over the last 12 months.

SUHJY's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is in the same range as CAOVY (14). This means that SUHJY’s stock grew similarly to CAOVY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CAOVYSUHJY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
53%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
46%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CAOVY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SUHJY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CXW20.110.45
+2.29%
CoreCivic
SHBI15.450.04
+0.26%
Shore Bancshares
PPC48.96-0.05
-0.10%
Pilgrim's Pride Corp
AGNCO25.52-0.06
-0.23%
AGNC Investment Corp
BHAT1.77-0.04
-2.21%
Blue Hat Interactive Entertainment Technology

CAOVY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAOVY has been closely correlated with LGFRY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAOVY jumps, then LGFRY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAOVY
1D Price
Change %
CAOVY100%
+4.94%
LGFRY - CAOVY
70%
Closely correlated
+0.36%
HLPPY - CAOVY
61%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
BEKE - CAOVY
54%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
SUHJY - CAOVY
51%
Loosely correlated
-1.09%
HLDCY - CAOVY
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
More

SUHJY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SUHJY has been loosely correlated with HLDCY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SUHJY jumps, then HLDCY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SUHJY
1D Price
Change %
SUHJY100%
-1.09%
HLDCY - SUHJY
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
HLPPY - SUHJY
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.29%
LGFRY - SUHJY
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.36%
CAOVY - SUHJY
51%
Loosely correlated
+4.94%
BEKE - SUHJY
46%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
More