Ad is loading...
CART
Price
$41.58
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 20 closing price
QRTEB
Price
$3.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
Ad is loading...

CART vs QRTEB

Header iconCART vs QRTEB Comparison
Open Charts CART vs QRTEBBanner chart's image
Maplebear
Price$41.58
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$6.73M
CapitalizationN/A
Qurate Retail
Price$3.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$4.04K
CapitalizationN/A
CART vs QRTEB Comparison Chart
Loading...
CART
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CART vs. QRTEB commentary
Nov 22, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CART is a StrongBuy and QRTEB is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 22, 2024
Stock price -- (CART: $43.25 vs. QRTEB: $3.02)
Brand notoriety: CART and QRTEB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CART: 134% vs. QRTEB: 115%
Market capitalization -- CART: $11.11B vs. QRTEB: $169.75M
CART [@Internet Retail] is valued at $11.11B. QRTEB’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $169.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.13T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $39.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CART’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileQRTEB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CART’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • QRTEB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CART is a better buy in the long-term than QRTEB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CART’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CART’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CART (@Internet Retail) experienced а +0.75% price change this week, while QRTEB (@Internet Retail) price change was -7.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

CART is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2024.

QRTEB is expected to report earnings on Nov 07, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (-0.25% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CART($11.1B) has a higher market cap than QRTEB($170M). CART YTD gains are higher at: 84.278 vs. QRTEB (-53.823). QRTEB has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 717M vs. CART (441M). CART has more cash in the bank: 1.31B vs. QRTEB (873M). CART has less debt than QRTEB: CART (28M) vs QRTEB (5.67B). QRTEB has higher revenues than CART: QRTEB (10.2B) vs CART (3.3B).
CARTQRTEBCART / QRTEB
Capitalization11.1B170M6,529%
EBITDA441M717M62%
Gain YTD84.278-53.823-157%
P/E Ratio4.10N/A-
Revenue3.3B10.2B32%
Total Cash1.31B873M150%
Total Debt28M5.67B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CART vs QRTEB: Fundamental Ratings
CART
QRTEB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6281
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
99
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6100
SMR RATING
1..100
5997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4184
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6192
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QRTEB's Valuation (62) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CART (99) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that QRTEB’s stock grew somewhat faster than CART’s over the last 12 months.

CART's Profit vs Risk Rating (6) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for QRTEB (100) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that CART’s stock grew significantly faster than QRTEB’s over the last 12 months.

CART's SMR Rating (59) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QRTEB (97) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that CART’s stock grew somewhat faster than QRTEB’s over the last 12 months.

CART's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QRTEB (84) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that CART’s stock grew somewhat faster than QRTEB’s over the last 12 months.

CART's P/E Growth Rating (61) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as QRTEB (92) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that CART’s stock grew similarly to QRTEB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CART
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CART
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBMCX22.690.55
+2.48%
BNY Mellon Sm/Md Cp Gr C
BOGIX33.760.47
+1.41%
SGI Small Cap Core Fund I Shares
STRSX32.580.31
+0.96%
Sterling Capital Special Opps R6
BCLPX8.43N/A
N/A
BlackRock Event Driven Equity Inv C
EEMDX7.95-0.04
-0.50%
MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research R1

CART and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CART and RVLV have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CART and RVLV's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CART
1D Price
Change %
CART100%
+4.02%
RVLV - CART
27%
Poorly correlated
+3.08%
W - CART
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.52%
QRTEA - CART
25%
Poorly correlated
+2.08%
AMZN - CART
23%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
LOGC - CART
23%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
More