CART
Price
$38.02
Change
-$0.29 (-0.76%)
Updated
Mar 11 closing price
Capitalization
10.06B
56 days until earnings call
QVCGB
Price
$6.80
Change
+$0.97 (+16.64%)
Updated
Mar 11 closing price
Capitalization
151.11M
51 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

CART vs QVCGB

Header iconCART vs QVCGB Comparison
Open Charts CART vs QVCGBBanner chart's image
Maplebear
Price$38.02
Change-$0.29 (-0.76%)
Volume$5.64M
Capitalization10.06B
QVC Group
Price$6.80
Change+$0.97 (+16.64%)
Volume$35.2K
Capitalization151.11M
CART vs QVCGB Comparison Chart
Loading...
CART
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CART vs. QVCGB commentary
Mar 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CART is a Hold and QVCGB is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 12, 2025
Stock price -- (CART: $38.02 vs. QVCGB: $6.80)
Brand notoriety: CART and QVCGB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Internet Retail industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CART: 118% vs. QVCGB: 14%
Market capitalization -- CART: $10.06B vs. QVCGB: $151.11M
CART [@Internet Retail] is valued at $10.06B. QVCGB’s [@Internet Retail] market capitalization is $151.11M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Internet Retail] industry ranges from $2.08T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Internet Retail] industry is $41.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CART’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileQVCGB’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CART’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • QVCGB’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CART is a better buy in the long-term than QVCGB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CART’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • CART’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

CART (@Internet Retail) experienced а -1.09% price change this week, while QVCGB (@Internet Retail) price change was -17.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Internet Retail industry was +0.76%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.80%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.73%.

Reported Earning Dates

CART is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

QVCGB is expected to report earnings on May 02, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Internet Retail (+0.76% weekly)

The internet retail industry includes companies that sell products and services through the Internet. With more and more consumers using online retailers, the companies have seen a big increase in the use of their services. Some of the companies in the group are focused on selling business-to-business products and services. Others sell business-to-consumer products and services. Internet retailers offer a wide variety of products like books, apparel, and electronics. Some companies even specialize in only one or two categories. One potentially critical factor for players to thrive in this space is the quality and speed of product delivery. This requires an investment in efficient distribution networks. Things like logistics are important factors in the success in the extremely competitive industry. For a company to stay relevant in the industry it must have effective pricing strategies and upgraded websites. The websites must be easy to navigate and engaging for customers. In addition to the revenues generated from straight sales, internet retailers can generate revenue from subscription fees and advertising. Amazon.com, Inc., Alibaba Group, and JD.com are some of the global leaders.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CART($10.1B) has a higher market cap than QVCGB($151M). QVCGB YTD gains are higher at: 135.294 vs. CART (-8.209).
CARTQVCGBCART / QVCGB
Capitalization10.1B151M6,689%
EBITDA441MN/A-
Gain YTD-8.209135.294-6%
P/E Ratio24.06N/A-
Revenue3.3BN/A-
Total Cash1.31BN/A-
Total Debt28MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CART vs QVCGB: Fundamental Ratings
CART
QVCGB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5595
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
62
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
11100
SMR RATING
1..100
5594
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6134
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
290
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

QVCGB's Valuation (62) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry is in the same range as CART (75) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that QVCGB’s stock grew similarly to CART’s over the last 12 months.

CART's Profit vs Risk Rating (11) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for QVCGB (100) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that CART’s stock grew significantly faster than QVCGB’s over the last 12 months.

CART's SMR Rating (55) in the Savings Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for QVCGB (94) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that CART’s stock grew somewhat faster than QVCGB’s over the last 12 months.

QVCGB's Price Growth Rating (34) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry is in the same range as CART (61) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that QVCGB’s stock grew similarly to CART’s over the last 12 months.

CART's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Savings Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for QVCGB (90) in the Catalog Or Specialty Distribution industry. This means that CART’s stock grew significantly faster than QVCGB’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CART
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend about 1 month ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CART
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OASGX10.310.07
+0.68%
Optimum Small-Mid Cap Growth A
HIOIX11.350.04
+0.35%
M3Sixty Income and Opportunity Instl
SVACX6.29N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Div C
MENRX9.39N/A
N/A
Madison Covered Call & Equity Income R6
CFJAX31.99N/A
N/A
Calvert US Large Cap Value Rspnb Idx A

CART and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CART and AMZN have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CART and AMZN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CART
1D Price
Change %
CART100%
-0.76%
AMZN - CART
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
DIBS - CART
23%
Poorly correlated
-4.76%
RVLV - CART
22%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
QVCGP - CART
22%
Poorly correlated
-6.38%
LOGC - CART
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.63%
More

QVCGB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that QVCGB and HOUR have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that QVCGB and HOUR's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To QVCGB
1D Price
Change %
QVCGB100%
+16.64%
HOUR - QVCGB
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
CART - QVCGB
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
NEGG - QVCGB
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.42%
ETSY - QVCGB
20%
Poorly correlated
-3.66%
BYON - QVCGB
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.74%
More