It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CAVA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while.
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CAVA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
CAVA (@Restaurants) experienced а +5.45% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Restaurants industry was -3.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.93%.
CAVA is expected to report earnings on Jun 03, 2025.
The industry includes companies that operate full-service restaurants, fast food restaurants, cafeterias and snack bars. McDonald`s Corporation, Starbucks Corporation, YUM! Brands, Inc. and Restaurant Brands International Inc. are some of the largest U.S. restaurant-owning companies in terms of market capitalization. While restaurant spending could be viewed as discretionary for consumers, some companies in the business have been able to weather economic cycles by establishing strong loyalty among customers over the years. Many of them also have a strong global presence as well.
CAVA | PFUT | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago78% | 1 day ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago75% | 1 day ago81% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% | 1 day ago75% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago87% | 1 day ago81% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago79% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago90% | 1 day ago77% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago87% | 10 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago76% | 8 days ago74% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago40% | 1 day ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago82% | 1 day ago76% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
ASHS | 27.01 | 0.56 | +2.12% |
Xtrackers Harvest CSI 500 CHN A SmCp ETF | |||
DMAR | 36.55 | -0.49 | -1.32% |
FT Vest US Equity Deep Bffr ETF Mar | |||
SPDW | 34.41 | -0.65 | -1.85% |
SPDR® Portfolio Developed Wld ex-US ETF | |||
FQAL | 60.57 | -1.57 | -2.52% |
Fidelity Quality Factor ETF | |||
FDNI | 27.67 | -0.86 | -3.01% |
First Trust Dow Jones Intl Intnt ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAVA has been loosely correlated with WING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CAVA jumps, then WING could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAVA | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CAVA | 100% | -3.46% | ||
WING - CAVA | 51% Loosely correlated | -2.41% | ||
SG - CAVA | 50% Loosely correlated | -3.56% | ||
SHAK - CAVA | 47% Loosely correlated | -6.17% | ||
EAT - CAVA | 42% Loosely correlated | -2.41% | ||
CMG - CAVA | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.30% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PFUT has been closely correlated with TPG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PFUT jumps, then TPG could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To PFUT | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
PFUT | 100% | -4.71% | ||
TPG - PFUT | 76% Closely correlated | -4.51% | ||
ZBRA - PFUT | 75% Closely correlated | -8.37% | ||
ADI - PFUT | 74% Closely correlated | -9.29% | ||
QCOM - PFUT | 72% Closely correlated | -6.40% | ||
MRVL - PFUT | 71% Closely correlated | -13.27% | ||
More |