CBBLF
Price
$0.02
Change
+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Updated
Jul 10 closing price
Capitalization
2.01M
CDBMF
Price
$0.56
Change
+$0.01 (+1.82%)
Updated
Jul 21 closing price
Capitalization
26.59M
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBBLF vs CDBMF

Header iconCBBLF vs CDBMF Comparison
Open Charts CBBLF vs CDBMFBanner chart's image
CBLT
Price$0.02
Change+$0.01 (+100.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization2.01M
Cordoba Minerals
Price$0.56
Change+$0.01 (+1.82%)
Volume$2.5K
Capitalization26.59M
CBBLF vs CDBMF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBBLF vs. CDBMF commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBLF is a Hold and CDBMF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CBBLF: $0.02 vs. CDBMF: $0.56)
Brand notoriety: CBBLF and CDBMF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBBLF: 204% vs. CDBMF: 13%
Market capitalization -- CBBLF: $2.01M vs. CDBMF: $26.59M
CBBLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.01M. CDBMF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $26.59M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.14B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBBLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCDBMF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBBLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CDBMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBBLF is a better buy in the long-term than CDBMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBBLF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CDBMF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBBLF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • CDBMF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CDBMF is a better buy in the short-term than CBBLF.

Price Growth

CBBLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CDBMF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +34.73%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.12% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CDBMF($26.6M) has a higher market cap than CBBLF($2.01M). CBBLF (100.000) and CDBMF (99.214) have similar YTD gains . CBBLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -428.02K vs. CDBMF (-31.74M). CBBLF has more cash in the bank: 1.35M vs. CDBMF (1.15M). CBBLF has less debt than CDBMF: CBBLF (107K) vs CDBMF (651K). CBBLF (0) and CDBMF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CBBLFCDBMFCBBLF / CDBMF
Capitalization2.01M26.6M8%
EBITDA-428.02K-31.74M1%
Gain YTD100.00099.214101%
P/E Ratio7.81N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.35M1.15M117%
Total Debt107K651K16%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBBLF vs CDBMF: Fundamental Ratings
CBBLF
CDBMF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3249
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
82
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9799
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3538
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CDBMF's Valuation (71) in the null industry is in the same range as CBBLF (82). This means that CDBMF’s stock grew similarly to CBBLF’s over the last 12 months.

CDBMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CBBLF (100). This means that CDBMF’s stock grew similarly to CBBLF’s over the last 12 months.

CBBLF's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBMF (99). This means that CBBLF’s stock grew similarly to CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

CBBLF's Price Growth Rating (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CDBMF (38). This means that CBBLF’s stock grew similarly to CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

CBBLF's P/E Growth Rating (10) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CDBMF (100). This means that CBBLF’s stock grew significantly faster than CDBMF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBBLFCDBMF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
18%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBBLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CDBMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OR27.920.02
+0.07%
OR Royalties Inc.
LVRO2.06N/A
N/A
Lavoro Limited
KOF85.55-1.47
-1.69%
Coca-Cola FEMSA SAB DE CV
OPAL2.51-0.06
-2.33%
OPAL Fuels
MLEC3.15-0.15
-4.45%
Moolec Science SA

CBBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBBLF and METOF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBBLF and METOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBBLF
1D Price
Change %
CBBLF100%
N/A
METOF - CBBLF
32%
Poorly correlated
-4.95%
EMTRF - CBBLF
27%
Poorly correlated
-3.18%
DCNNF - CBBLF
24%
Poorly correlated
+5.00%
CAMZF - CBBLF
7%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGMLF - CBBLF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CDBMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CDBMF and SFRRF have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CDBMF and SFRRF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CDBMF
1D Price
Change %
CDBMF100%
N/A
SFRRF - CDBMF
21%
Poorly correlated
-5.41%
CHXMF - CDBMF
9%
Poorly correlated
-5.27%
CBBHF - CDBMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CGMLF - CDBMF
6%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBBLF - CDBMF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More