CBBLF vs CGMLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBLF is a Hold and CGMLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBBLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCGMLF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- CBBLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CGMLF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Price Growth
CBBLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CGMLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -17.01% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.
| CBBLF | CGMLF | CBBLF / CGMLF | |
| Capitalization | 2.01M | 1.55B | 0% |
| EBITDA | -428.02K | -70.16M | 1% |
| Gain YTD | -60.000 | -16.667 | 360% |
| P/E Ratio | 7.81 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 0 | 125K | - |
| Total Cash | 1.35M | 115M | 1% |
| Total Debt | 107K | 349K | 31% |
CBBLF | CGMLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 70 Overvalued | 97 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 85 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 95 | 95 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 96 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 18 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CBBLF's Valuation (70) in the null industry is in the same range as CGMLF (97). This means that CBBLF’s stock grew similarly to CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.
CGMLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (85) in the null industry is in the same range as CBBLF (100). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew similarly to CBBLF’s over the last 12 months.
CGMLF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as CBBLF (95). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew similarly to CBBLF’s over the last 12 months.
CGMLF's Price Growth Rating (59) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBBLF (96). This means that CGMLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBBLF’s over the last 12 months.
CBBLF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CGMLF (100). This means that CBBLF’s stock grew significantly faster than CGMLF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| INFFX | 9.36 | 0.06 | +0.65% |
| Tortoise Energy Infrastructure and Inc C | |||
| IRGTX | 10.34 | 0.04 | +0.39% |
| VY® CBRE Global Real Estate S | |||
| TSORX | 13.33 | -0.08 | -0.60% |
| Nuveen International Res Eq A | |||
| HSWRX | 17.61 | -0.15 | -0.84% |
| Hartford Schroders International Stk R3 | |||
| AZMAX | 15.75 | -0.14 | -0.88% |
| Virtus NFJ Emerging Markets Value A | |||
CBBLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CBBLF and METOF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBBLF and METOF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBBLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBBLF | 100% | N/A | ||
| METOF - CBBLF | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
| EMTRF - CBBLF | 27% Poorly correlated | -7.41% | ||
| DCNNF - CBBLF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CAMZF - CBBLF | 7% Poorly correlated | -12.81% | ||
| CGMLF - CBBLF | 3% Poorly correlated | -7.08% | ||
More | ||||
CGMLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGMLF and NAK have been poorly correlated (+31% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGMLF and NAK's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGMLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGMLF | 100% | -7.08% | ||
| NAK - CGMLF | 31% Poorly correlated | -0.83% | ||
| CVVUF - CGMLF | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.89% | ||
| PMETF - CGMLF | 20% Poorly correlated | -7.22% | ||
| SYAXF - CGMLF | 20% Poorly correlated | -8.88% | ||
| GLNCY - CGMLF | 20% Poorly correlated | +0.32% | ||
More | ||||