Ad is loading...
CBBLF
Price
$0.01
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 12 closing price
EMTRF
Price
$0.30
Change
-$0.02 (-6.25%)
Updated
Nov 15 closing price
Ad is loading...

CBBLF vs EMTRF

Header iconCBBLF vs EMTRF Comparison
Open Charts CBBLF vs EMTRFBanner chart's image
CBLT
Price$0.01
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7K
CapitalizationN/A
Element 29 Resources
Price$0.30
Change-$0.02 (-6.25%)
Volume$12.86K
CapitalizationN/A
CBBLF vs EMTRF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBBLF vs. EMTRF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBBLF is a Hold and EMTRF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (CBBLF: $0.01 vs. EMTRF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: CBBLF and EMTRF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBBLF: 43% vs. EMTRF: 28%
Market capitalization -- CBBLF: $2.01M vs. EMTRF: $11.18M
CBBLF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.01M. EMTRF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $11.18M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBBLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileEMTRF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBBLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • EMTRF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, EMTRF is a better buy in the long-term than CBBLF.

Price Growth

CBBLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EMTRF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -14.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.62%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
EMTRF($11.2M) has a higher market cap than CBBLF($2.01M). EMTRF YTD gains are higher at: 105.761 vs. CBBLF (-60.000). CBBLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -428.02K vs. EMTRF (-2.68M). CBBLF has more cash in the bank: 1.35M vs. EMTRF (645K). EMTRF has less debt than CBBLF: EMTRF (40K) vs CBBLF (107K). CBBLF (0) and EMTRF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CBBLFEMTRFCBBLF / EMTRF
Capitalization2.01M11.2M18%
EBITDA-428.02K-2.68M16%
Gain YTD-60.000105.761-57%
P/E Ratio7.81N/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.35M645K209%
Total Debt107K40K268%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBBLF: Fundamental Ratings
CBBLF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
96
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
18
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MICSX13.30-0.01
-0.08%
Matthews Asian Growth & Income Instl
SEKRX18.31-0.06
-0.33%
DWS Emerging Markets Equity R6
DDIIX15.55-0.10
-0.64%
Delaware Wealth Builder Institutional
FGLGX23.74-0.22
-0.92%
Fidelity Series Large Cap Stock
OPMCX22.03-0.27
-1.21%
Invesco Main Street Mid Cap C

CBBLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CBBLF and METOF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CBBLF and METOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBBLF
1D Price
Change %
CBBLF100%
N/A
METOF - CBBLF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.14%
EMTRF - CBBLF
27%
Poorly correlated
-7.41%
DCNNF - CBBLF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CAMZF - CBBLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-12.81%
CGMLF - CBBLF
3%
Poorly correlated
-7.08%
More

EMTRF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMTRF and CBBLF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMTRF and CBBLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMTRF
1D Price
Change %
EMTRF100%
-7.41%
CBBLF - EMTRF
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GTCDF - EMTRF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KVGOF - EMTRF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ZZZOF - EMTRF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANSNF - EMTRF
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More