Ad is loading...
CBFSX vs LAGVX
CBFSX vs LAGVX Comparison
Open Charts CBFSX vs LAGVX
JPMorgan Corporate Bond I
Price$8.36
Change+$0.02 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets362.01M
Lord Abbett Income A
Price$2.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.65B
CBFSX vs LAGVX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBFSX vs. LAGVX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFSX is a Hold and LAGVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGVX has more cash in the bank: 5.65B vs. CBFSX (362M). LAGVX pays higher dividends than CBFSX: LAGVX (5.54) vs CBFSX (4.91). CBFSX was incepted earlier than LAGVX: CBFSX (12 years) vs LAGVX (43 years). CBFSX (0.79) is less costly to investors than LAGVX (0.71). LAGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 190.00 vs. CBFSX (131.00). LAGVX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBFSX: LAGVX (1500) vs CBFSX (1000000). CBFSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.67 vs. LAGVX (7.02). LAGVX return over 5 years is better than : 8.32 vs. CBFSX (-2.12).
| CBFSX | LAGVX | CBFSX / LAGVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.71 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 0.71 | 111% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 43 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.449 | 1.420 | 172% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1500 | 66,667% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 362M | 5.65B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.91 | 5.54 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.67 | 7.02 | 109% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.61 | 7.46 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.12 | 8.32 | -25% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.66 | 26.62 | 70% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers