Ad is loading...
CBFSX vs PBDAX
CBFSX vs PBDAX Comparison
Open Charts CBFSX vs PBDAX
JPMorgan Corporate Bond I
Price$8.36
Change+$0.02 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets362.01M
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond A
Price$9.03
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.6B
CBFSX vs PBDAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBFSX vs. PBDAX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFSX is a Hold and PBDAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PBDAX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. CBFSX (362M). CBFSX pays higher dividends than PBDAX: CBFSX (4.91) vs PBDAX (4.04). CBFSX was incepted earlier than PBDAX: CBFSX (12 years) vs PBDAX (21 years). PBDAX (1.49) is less costly to investors than CBFSX (0.79). PBDAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. CBFSX (131.00). PBDAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBFSX: PBDAX (1000) vs CBFSX (1000000). PBDAX (7.87) and CBFSX (7.67) have marching annual gain over last year. PBDAX return over 5 years is better than : 1.26 vs. CBFSX (-2.12).
| CBFSX | PBDAX | CBFSX / PBDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.49 | 34% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.49 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.449 | 2.413 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 362M | 12.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.91 | 4.04 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.67 | 7.87 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.61 | 8.88 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.12 | 1.26 | -167% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.66 | 20.93 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...