Ad is loading...
CBFSX vs PCNNX
CBFSX vs PCNNX Comparison
Open Charts CBFSX vs PCNNX
JPMorgan Corporate Bond I
Price$8.36
Change+$0.02 (+0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets362.01M
PIMCO Investment Grade Credit Bond I-3
Price$9.03
Change+$0.02 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.6B
CBFSX vs PCNNX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBFSX vs. PCNNX commentary
Apr 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFSX is a Hold and PCNNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PCNNX has more cash in the bank: 12.6B vs. CBFSX (362M). CBFSX pays higher dividends than PCNNX: CBFSX (4.91) vs PCNNX (4.28). CBFSX was incepted earlier than PCNNX: CBFSX (12 years) vs PCNNX (7 years). PCNNX (1.29) is less costly to investors than CBFSX (0.79). PCNNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 150.00 vs. CBFSX (131.00). CBFSX (1000000) and PCNNX (1000000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. PCNNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.15 vs. CBFSX (7.67). PCNNX return over 5 years is better than : 2.52 vs. CBFSX (-2.12).
| CBFSX | PCNNX | CBFSX / PCNNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 1.24 | 40% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.79 | 1.29 | 61% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.449 | 2.476 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 362M | 12.6B | 3% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.91 | 4.28 | 115% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.67 | 8.15 | 94% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.61 | 9.68 | 99% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.12 | 2.52 | -84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...