CBFV
Price
$29.25
Change
+$0.66 (+2.31%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
111.19M
20 days until earnings call
PNFP
Price
$117.83
Change
+$0.83 (+0.71%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.62B
11 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBFV vs PNFP

Header iconCBFV vs PNFP Comparison
Open Charts CBFV vs PNFPBanner chart's image
CB Financial Services
Price$29.25
Change+$0.66 (+2.31%)
Volume$7.82K
Capitalization111.19M
Pinnacle Financial Partners
Price$117.83
Change+$0.83 (+0.71%)
Volume$381.9K
Capitalization6.62B
CBFV vs PNFP Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBFV vs. PNFP commentary
Jul 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFV is a Buy and PNFP is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 04, 2025
Stock price -- (CBFV: $29.25 vs. PNFP: $117.83)
Brand notoriety: CBFV and PNFP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBFV: 28% vs. PNFP: 93%
Market capitalization -- CBFV: $111.19M vs. PNFP: $6.62B
CBFV [@Regional Banks] is valued at $111.19M. PNFP’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $6.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBFV’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whilePNFP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • CBFV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • PNFP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PNFP is a better buy in the long-term than CBFV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBFV’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PNFP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBFV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PNFP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both CBFV and PNFP are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

CBFV (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.67% price change this week, while PNFP (@Regional Banks) price change was +7.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.85%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBFV is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

PNFP is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.86% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PNFP($6.62B) has a higher market cap than CBFV($111M). PNFP has higher P/E ratio than CBFV: PNFP (11.70) vs CBFV (4.89). CBFV YTD gains are higher at: 4.059 vs. PNFP (3.446). CBFV has less debt than PNFP: CBFV (34.7M) vs PNFP (2.56B). PNFP has higher revenues than CBFV: PNFP (1.38B) vs CBFV (42.4M).
CBFVPNFPCBFV / PNFP
Capitalization111M6.62B2%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.0593.446118%
P/E Ratio4.8911.7042%
Revenue42.4M1.38B3%
Total CashN/A229M-
Total Debt34.7M2.56B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBFV vs PNFP: Fundamental Ratings
CBFV
PNFP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3124
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
50
Fair valued
84
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5135
SMR RATING
1..100
5210
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5143
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
414
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4585

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBFV's Valuation (50) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PNFP (84). This means that CBFV’s stock grew somewhat faster than PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (51). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's SMR Rating (10) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBFV (52). This means that PNFP’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

PNFP's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as CBFV (51). This means that PNFP’s stock grew similarly to CBFV’s over the last 12 months.

CBFV's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as PNFP (14). This means that CBFV’s stock grew similarly to PNFP’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBFVPNFP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 22 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBFV
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PNFP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMACX45.140.47
+1.05%
American Funds AMCAP F3
FDTEX34.58N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Diversified Stock M
HWLAX43.74N/A
N/A
Hotchkis & Wiley Large Cap Fdml Value A
GSMCX37.89N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Instl
IENRX9.89N/A
N/A
Macquarie Climate Solutions R6

CBFV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBFV has been loosely correlated with CMA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBFV jumps, then CMA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBFV
1D Price
Change %
CBFV100%
+2.31%
CMA - CBFV
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.29%
UBFO - CBFV
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.20%
SHBI - CBFV
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.77%
WSFS - CBFV
46%
Loosely correlated
+1.44%
PNFP - CBFV
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
More

PNFP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PNFP has been closely correlated with SNV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 94% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PNFP jumps, then SNV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PNFP
1D Price
Change %
PNFP100%
+0.71%
SNV - PNFP
94%
Closely correlated
+0.29%
FNB - PNFP
92%
Closely correlated
+1.63%
ONB - PNFP
92%
Closely correlated
+1.16%
WTFC - PNFP
91%
Closely correlated
+1.24%
ASB - PNFP
91%
Closely correlated
+0.94%
More