Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBFVX vs LAGVX
CBFVX vs LAGVX Comparison
Open Charts CBFVX vs LAGVX
JPMorgan Corporate Bond R6
Price$8.38
Change-$0.01 (-0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets372.23M
Lord Abbett Income A
Price$2.43
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets5.8B
CBFVX vs LAGVX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBFVX vs. LAGVX commentary
Jun 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBFVX is a Hold and LAGVX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
LAGVX has more cash in the bank: 5.8B vs. CBFVX (372M). LAGVX pays higher dividends than CBFVX: LAGVX (5.62) vs CBFVX (5.10). CBFVX was incepted earlier than LAGVX: CBFVX (12 years) vs LAGVX (44 years). LAGVX (0.71) is less costly to investors than CBFVX (0.54). LAGVX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 190.00 vs. CBFVX (70.00). LAGVX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBFVX: LAGVX (1500) vs CBFVX (15000000). CBFVX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.17 vs. LAGVX (5.69). LAGVX return over 5 years is better than : 4.93 vs. CBFVX (-4.06).
| CBFVX | LAGVX | CBFVX / LAGVX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.40 | 0.71 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.71 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.809 | 3.227 | 118% |
| Front Load | N/A | 2% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000000 | 1500 | 1,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 372M | 5.8B | 6% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.10 | 5.62 | 91% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.17 | 5.69 | 108% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.89 | 14.32 | 104% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.06 | 4.93 | -82% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.03 | 30.69 | 78% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement