Ad is loading...
CBLCX vs RLBFX
CBLCX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CBLCX vs RLBFX
Columbia Balanced C
Price$50.17
Change+$0.08 (+0.16%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.27B
American Funds American Balanced R5
Price$34.44
Change+$0.05 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.05B
CBLCX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLCX vs. RLBFX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLCX is a Buy and RLBFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBFX has more cash in the bank: 234B vs. CBLCX (9.27B). RLBFX pays higher dividends than CBLCX: RLBFX (2.26) vs CBLCX (1.10). CBLCX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CBLCX (22 years) vs RLBFX (23 years). CBLCX (1.68) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.29). CBLCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 200.00 vs. RLBFX (44.00). RLBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLCX: RLBFX (250) vs CBLCX (2000). RLBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.06 vs. CBLCX (0.21). RLBFX return over 5 years is better than : 38.47 vs. CBLCX (23.33).
| CBLCX | RLBFX | CBLCX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.68 | 0.29 | 579% |
| Fund Existence | 22 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.798 | 0.528 | -340% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 250 | 800% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 9.27B | 234B | 4% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 2.26 | 48% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.21 | 5.06 | 4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.87 | 22.75 | 74% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.33 | 38.47 | 61% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.38 | 53.33 | 76% |