Ad is loading...
CBLLX vs RMFCX
CBLLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLLX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Admin
Price$9.96
Change+$0.07 (+0.71%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets144.19M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$53.74
Change+$0.73 (+1.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets97.26B
CBLLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 97.3B vs. CBLLX (144M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLLX: RMFCX (1.34) vs CBLLX (0.74). CBLLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLLX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBLLX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CBLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLLX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLLX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.87 vs. CBLLX (-19.19). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 54.30 vs. CBLLX (-3.68).
| CBLLX | RMFCX | CBLLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.592 | -1.247 | 128% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 144M | 97.3B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.34 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -19.19 | 3.87 | -496% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.34 | 9.64 | -336% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.68 | 54.30 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | -19.04 | 55.97 | -34% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...