Ad is loading...
CBLLX vs RMFCX
CBLLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLLX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Admin
Price$10.36
Change+$0.05 (+0.48%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets163.58M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$55.77
Change+$0.30 (+0.54%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets103.41B
CBLLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. CBLLX (164M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLLX: RMFCX (1.69) vs CBLLX (1.20). CBLLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLLX (20 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLLX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLLX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.43 vs. CBLLX (-10.04). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 37.82 vs. CBLLX (-27.01).
| CBLLX | RMFCX | CBLLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.085 | 2.162 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.69 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.04 | 12.43 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | -32.76 | 12.60 | -260% |
| Returns for 5 years | -27.01 | 37.82 | -71% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.06 | 65.18 | -17% |