Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLLX vs RMFCX
CBLLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLLX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Admin
Price$10.68
Change-$0.08 (-0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.52M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.52
Change-$0.44 (-0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets106.6B
CBLLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 107B vs. CBLLX (155M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLLX: RMFCX (1.31) vs CBLLX (0.72). CBLLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLLX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBLLX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CBLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLLX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLLX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. CBLLX (-13.90). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 59.85 vs. CBLLX (-4.39).
| CBLLX | RMFCX | CBLLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.065 | 6.021 | 117% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 155M | 107B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.72 | 1.31 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.90 | 8.70 | -160% |
| Returns for 3 years | -18.19 | 28.43 | -64% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.39 | 59.85 | -7% |
| Returns for 10 years | -11.78 | 69.75 | -17% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement