Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CBLLX vs RMFCX
CBLLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLLX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Admin
Price$11.08
Change-$0.05 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets158.63M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$60.11
Change-$0.30 (-0.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets110.54B
CBLLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Jul 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLLX is a Buy and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 111B vs. CBLLX (159M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLLX: RMFCX (1.27) vs CBLLX (0.70). CBLLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLLX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). RMFCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than CBLLX (0.84). CBLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLLX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLLX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.03 vs. CBLLX (-15.30). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 58.85 vs. CBLLX (-6.18).
| CBLLX | RMFCX | CBLLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.84 | 0.91 | 92% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.746 | 11.347 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 159M | 111B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.70 | 1.27 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -15.30 | 10.03 | -152% |
| Returns for 3 years | -21.38 | 27.58 | -78% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.18 | 58.85 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | -8.19 | 80.13 | -10% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement