Ad is loading...
CBLLX vs RMFCX
CBLLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLLX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Admin
Price$10.40
Change-$0.13 (-1.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets164.45M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$57.23
Change-$0.62 (-1.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets105.48B
CBLLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Feb 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLLX is a Hold and RMFCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 105B vs. CBLLX (164M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLLX: RMFCX (1.69) vs CBLLX (1.20). CBLLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLLX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RMFCX (25.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLLX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLLX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.03 vs. CBLLX (-11.82). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 41.75 vs. CBLLX (-24.37).
| CBLLX | RMFCX | CBLLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.776 | 4.836 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 164M | 105B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 1.69 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | -11.82 | 11.03 | -107% |
| Returns for 3 years | -29.33 | 19.69 | -149% |
| Returns for 5 years | -24.37 | 41.75 | -58% |
| Returns for 10 years | -13.47 | 64.83 | -21% |