Ad is loading...
CBLLX vs RMFCX
CBLLX vs RMFCX Comparison
Open Charts CBLLX vs RMFCX
Allspring Large Cap Value Admin
Price$9.94
Change-$0.36 (-3.50%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets152.78M
American Funds American Mutual R3
Price$54.14
Change-$1.81 (-3.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets102.75B
CBLLX vs RMFCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLLX vs. RMFCX commentary
Apr 05, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLLX is a Hold and RMFCX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RMFCX has more cash in the bank: 103B vs. CBLLX (153M). RMFCX pays higher dividends than CBLLX: RMFCX (1.34) vs CBLLX (0.74). CBLLX was incepted earlier than RMFCX: CBLLX (21 years) vs RMFCX (23 years). CBLLX (1.14) is less costly to investors than RMFCX (0.91). CBLLX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 98.00 vs. RMFCX (31.00). RMFCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CBLLX: RMFCX (250) vs CBLLX (1000000). RMFCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. CBLLX (-17.32). RMFCX return over 5 years is better than : 76.10 vs. CBLLX (13.34).
| CBLLX | RMFCX | CBLLX / RMFCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.75 | 0.91 | 82% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.14 | 0.91 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.488 | 2.814 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 250 | 400,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 153M | 103B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.74 | 1.34 | 55% |
| Returns for 1 year | -17.32 | 6.77 | -256% |
| Returns for 3 years | -31.59 | 11.46 | -276% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.34 | 76.10 | 18% |
| Returns for 10 years | -15.36 | 64.62 | -24% |