Ad is loading...
CBLS vs FHEQ
CBLS vs FHEQ Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CBLS vs. FHEQ commentary
Apr 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBLS is a Buy and FHEQ is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHEQ has more net assets: 532M vs. CBLS (40.3M). CBLS has a higher annual dividend yield than FHEQ: CBLS (1.035) vs FHEQ (-6.033). CBLS was incepted earlier than FHEQ: CBLS (4 years) vs FHEQ (1 year). FHEQ (0.48) has a lower expense ratio than CBLS (2.59). CBLS has a higher turnover FHEQ (37.00) vs FHEQ (37.00).
| CBLS | FHEQ | CBLS / FHEQ | |
| Gain YTD | 1.035 | -6.033 | -17% |
| Net Assets | 40.3M | 532M | 8% |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.59 | 0.48 | 540% |
| Turnover | 509.00 | 37.00 | 1,376% |
| Yield | 0.74 | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 1 year | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| FHEQ | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| FCA | 20.50 | 0.35 | +1.74% |
| First Trust China AlphaDEX® ETF | |||
| PDP | 97.59 | 1.46 | +1.52% |
| Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | |||
| IWM | 190.25 | 2.78 | +1.48% |
| iShares Russell 2000 ETF | |||
| JHI | 12.98 | 0.13 | +1.01% |
| John Hancock Investors Trust Capital Stock | |||
| TBT | 36.14 | -0.72 | -1.95% |
| ProShares UltraShort 20+ Year Treasury | |||
CBLS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBLS has been loosely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBLS jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBLS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CBLS | 100% | +1.13% | ||
| COIN - CBLS | 48% Loosely correlated | +2.53% | ||
| RDDT - CBLS | 44% Loosely correlated | +5.42% | ||
| SAP - CBLS | 44% Loosely correlated | +7.56% | ||
| TSLA - CBLS | 43% Loosely correlated | +5.37% | ||
| NU - CBLS | 43% Loosely correlated | +2.68% | ||
More | ||||
FHEQ and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FHEQ has been closely correlated with AMZN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FHEQ jumps, then AMZN could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FHEQ | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FHEQ | 100% | +1.03% | ||
| AMZN - FHEQ | 76% Closely correlated | +4.28% | ||
| MSFT - FHEQ | 74% Closely correlated | +2.06% | ||
| NVDA - FHEQ | 70% Closely correlated | +3.86% | ||
| META - FHEQ | 68% Closely correlated | +4.00% | ||
| GOOG - FHEQ | 68% Closely correlated | +2.48% | ||
More | ||||