CBRE
Price
$138.15
Change
+$2.93 (+2.17%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
29.03B
33 days until earnings call
FPH
Price
$5.59
Change
+$0.01 (+0.18%)
Updated
Jun 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
218.29M
33 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

CBRE vs FPH

Header iconCBRE vs FPH Comparison
Open Charts CBRE vs FPHBanner chart's image
Cbre Group
Price$138.15
Change+$2.93 (+2.17%)
Volume$6.55K
Capitalization29.03B
Five Point Holdings
Price$5.59
Change+$0.01 (+0.18%)
Volume$201
Capitalization218.29M
CBRE vs FPH Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
CBRE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBRE vs. FPH commentary
Jun 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBRE is a Buy and FPH is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 27, 2025
Stock price -- (CBRE: $138.09 vs. FPH: $5.60)
Brand notoriety: CBRE and FPH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Development industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBRE: 110% vs. FPH: 32%
Market capitalization -- CBRE: $29.03B vs. FPH: $218.29M
CBRE [@Real Estate Development] is valued at $29.03B. FPH’s [@Real Estate Development] market capitalization is $218.29M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Development] industry ranges from $165.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Development] industry is $5.6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBRE’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFPH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • CBRE’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FPH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CBRE is a better buy in the long-term than FPH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBRE’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPH’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBRE’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • FPH’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBRE is a better buy in the short-term than FPH.

Price Growth

CBRE (@Real Estate Development) experienced а +3.46% price change this week, while FPH (@Real Estate Development) price change was +0.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Development industry was +2.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.89%.

Reported Earning Dates

CBRE is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2025.

FPH is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Development (+2.05% weekly)

Activities range from the renovation and re-lease of existing buildings to the purchase of raw land and the sale of developed land or parcels to others. Demand for land development business is driven by GDP growth, employment rates, interest rates, and access to/cost of capital. For individual companies in this industry, proper cost estimation and successful bidding play critical roles in their profitability. Large companies could potentially have greater access to capital, while smaller companies can specialize in a specific geographic area or market niche. CBRE Group, VICI Properties Inc and Brookfield Property Partners L.P. are some of the large companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CBRE($29B) has a higher market cap than FPH($218M). CBRE has higher P/E ratio than FPH: CBRE (30.15) vs FPH (4.16). FPH YTD gains are higher at: 48.148 vs. CBRE (5.179). CBRE has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.71B vs. FPH (46.1M). CBRE has more cash in the bank: 1.27B vs. FPH (354M). FPH has less debt than CBRE: FPH (633M) vs CBRE (4.83B). CBRE has higher revenues than FPH: CBRE (31.9B) vs FPH (212M).
CBREFPHCBRE / FPH
Capitalization29B218M13,303%
EBITDA1.71B46.1M3,714%
Gain YTD5.17948.14811%
P/E Ratio30.154.16725%
Revenue31.9B212M15,047%
Total Cash1.27B354M357%
Total Debt4.83B633M762%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBRE vs FPH: Fundamental Ratings
CBRE
FPH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2816
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
94
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1789
SMR RATING
1..100
6160
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1038
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1523
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5026

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBRE's Valuation (91) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FPH (94). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to FPH’s over the last 12 months.

CBRE's Profit vs Risk Rating (17) in the Real Estate Development industry is significantly better than the same rating for FPH (89). This means that CBRE’s stock grew significantly faster than FPH’s over the last 12 months.

FPH's SMR Rating (60) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as CBRE (61). This means that FPH’s stock grew similarly to CBRE’s over the last 12 months.

CBRE's Price Growth Rating (10) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FPH (38). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to FPH’s over the last 12 months.

CBRE's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Real Estate Development industry is in the same range as FPH (23). This means that CBRE’s stock grew similarly to FPH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBREFPH
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
78%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
CBRE
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CHMG48.922.05
+4.37%
Chemung Financial Corp
CXT55.580.90
+1.65%
Crane NXT Co
FNV164.721.32
+0.81%
Franco-Nevada Corp
SHEN14.030.07
+0.50%
Shenandoah Telecommunications Co
TLPH0.44-0.01
-1.57%
Talphera

CBRE and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBRE has been closely correlated with JLL. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CBRE jumps, then JLL could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBRE
1D Price
Change %
CBRE100%
+2.12%
JLL - CBRE
88%
Closely correlated
+3.71%
NMRK - CBRE
84%
Closely correlated
+3.97%
CWK - CBRE
81%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
CIGI - CBRE
78%
Closely correlated
+1.75%
MMI - CBRE
71%
Closely correlated
+1.54%
More

FPH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPH and JLL have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPH and JLL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPH
1D Price
Change %
FPH100%
+0.36%
JLL - FPH
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.71%
NMRK - FPH
30%
Poorly correlated
+3.97%
CBRE - FPH
29%
Poorly correlated
+2.12%
CWK - FPH
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
RMR - FPH
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.97%
More