CBRSF
Price
$0.03
Change
-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Updated
Dec 18 closing price
RKMSF
Price
$0.02
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
Ad is loading...

CBRSF vs RKMSF

Header iconCBRSF vs RKMSF Comparison
Open Charts CBRSF vs RKMSFBanner chart's image
Champion Bear Resources
Price$0.03
Change-$0.01 (-25.00%)
Volume$12.19K
CapitalizationN/A
Rokmaster Resources
Price$0.02
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$9.88K
CapitalizationN/A
CBRSF vs RKMSF Comparison Chart
Loading...
CBRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RKMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
CBRSF vs. RKMSF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBRSF is a Hold and RKMSF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (CBRSF: $0.03 vs. RKMSF: $0.02)
Brand notoriety: CBRSF and RKMSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: CBRSF: 62% vs. RKMSF: 57%
Market capitalization -- CBRSF: $3.34M vs. RKMSF: $9.85M
CBRSF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $3.34M. RKMSF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $9.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

CBRSF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRKMSF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • CBRSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RKMSF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, RKMSF is a better buy in the long-term than CBRSF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

CBRSF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RKMSF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • CBRSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • RKMSF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, RKMSF is a better buy in the short-term than CBRSF.

Price Growth

CBRSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -18.70% price change this week, while RKMSF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -3.63% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -3.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-3.39% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RKMSF($9.85M) has a higher market cap than CBRSF($3.34M). CBRSF YTD gains are higher at: -50.000 vs. RKMSF (-65.695). CBRSF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -315.42K vs. RKMSF (-5.73M). RKMSF has more cash in the bank: 357K vs. CBRSF (1.52K). CBRSF has less debt than RKMSF: CBRSF (4.6K) vs RKMSF (212K). CBRSF (0) and RKMSF (0) have equivalent revenues.
CBRSFRKMSFCBRSF / RKMSF
Capitalization3.34M9.85M34%
EBITDA-315.42K-5.73M6%
Gain YTD-50.000-65.69576%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue00-
Total Cash1.52K357K0%
Total Debt4.6K212K2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
CBRSF vs RKMSF: Fundamental Ratings
CBRSF
RKMSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9389
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
61
Fair valued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9299
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
9764
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RKMSF's Valuation (35) in the null industry is in the same range as CBRSF (61). This means that RKMSF’s stock grew similarly to CBRSF’s over the last 12 months.

RKMSF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CBRSF (100). This means that RKMSF’s stock grew similarly to CBRSF’s over the last 12 months.

CBRSF's SMR Rating (92) in the null industry is in the same range as RKMSF (99). This means that CBRSF’s stock grew similarly to RKMSF’s over the last 12 months.

RKMSF's Price Growth Rating (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBRSF (97). This means that RKMSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBRSF’s over the last 12 months.

RKMSF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CBRSF (100). This means that RKMSF’s stock grew similarly to CBRSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CBRSFRKMSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
56%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
CBRSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RKMSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGICX11.94N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Global Infras C
DPRIX68.54N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth Y
AMEFX24.75-0.13
-0.52%
American Funds Income Fund of Amer F2
MUOAX30.07-0.17
-0.56%
Morgan Stanley Instl US Core A
SGRAX25.21-0.24
-0.94%
Allspring Growth A

CBRSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBRSF has been loosely correlated with KOGMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 52% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBRSF jumps, then KOGMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBRSF
1D Price
Change %
CBRSF100%
+300.00%
KOGMF - CBRSF
52%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KGLLF - CBRSF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ALTPF - CBRSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SAIDF - CBRSF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RKMSF - CBRSF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

RKMSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that RKMSF and BRYGF have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that RKMSF and BRYGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RKMSF
1D Price
Change %
RKMSF100%
N/A
BRYGF - RKMSF
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GOMRF - RKMSF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KOGMF - RKMSF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBRSF - RKMSF
22%
Poorly correlated
-25.00%
SIERF - RKMSF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More