CBT vs TRS
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CBT is a Hold and TRS is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBT’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTRS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- CBT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- TRS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBT’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TRS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- CBT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- TRS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
Price Growth
CBT (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -1.53% price change this week, while TRS (@Containers/Packaging) price change was +16.03% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was +1.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.24%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Containers/Packaging industry was -0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.54%.
Reported Earning Dates
CBT is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2025.
TRS is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Chemicals: Specialty (+1.77% weekly)The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.
@Containers/Packaging (-0.22% weekly)The containers/packing sector includes companies that manufacture containers (like plastic and aluminum food containers, glass bottles, metal cans, cardboard, storage and waste bags, giftwraps etc.) and provide packing services. Food-and-beverage and household products are major markets for this business. Several companies in this industry cater to international markets in addition to serving domestic customers. Consumer spending habits could potentially affect this industry’s performance. Some products, that use oil-based materials as inputs, are likely to see their costs of production get impacted (to some extent) by energy price movements. The ever-expanding e-commerce market has only supercharged the amount/frequency of goods shipped domestically and across borders, thereby creating ample potential opportunities for containers and packaging businesses. Ball Corporation, International Paper Company, Amcor Plc and Packaging Corporation of America are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.
| CBT | TRS | CBT / TRS | |
| Capitalization | 5.11B | 1.1B | 466% |
| EBITDA | 701M | 124M | 565% |
| Gain YTD | -14.156 | 0.847 | -1,671% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.08 | 27.36 | 44% |
| Revenue | 3.92B | 894M | 439% |
| Total Cash | 244M | 34.9M | 699% |
| Total Debt | 1.31B | 443M | 296% |
CBT | TRS | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 51 | 24 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 48 Fair valued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | 87 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 32 | 83 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 79 | 55 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 68 | 29 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 35 | 14 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CBT's Valuation (48) in the Industrial Specialties industry is in the same range as TRS (68) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that CBT’s stock grew similarly to TRS’s over the last 12 months.
CBT's Profit vs Risk Rating (30) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRS (87) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that CBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRS’s over the last 12 months.
CBT's SMR Rating (32) in the Industrial Specialties industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TRS (83) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry. This means that CBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than TRS’s over the last 12 months.
TRS's Price Growth Rating (55) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is in the same range as CBT (79) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that TRS’s stock grew similarly to CBT’s over the last 12 months.
TRS's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CBT (68) in the Industrial Specialties industry. This means that TRS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CBT’s over the last 12 months.
| CBT | TRS | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 84% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 62% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 2 days ago 65% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 68% | 2 days ago 59% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 6 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 69% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| EWG | 40.34 | 0.88 | +2.23% |
| iShares MSCI Germany ETF | |||
| BATT | 8.37 | 0.17 | +2.05% |
| Amplify Lithium & Battery Tech ETF | |||
| IDE | 10.77 | 0.16 | +1.51% |
| Voya Infrastructure Industrials AND Materials Fund | |||
| HYGI | 26.71 | 0.08 | +0.29% |
| iShares Inflation Hedged Hgh Yld Bd ETF | |||
| KORP | 46.06 | -0.12 | -0.26% |
| American Century Dvrs Corp Bd ETF | |||