Loading...
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
CBZ’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileGHC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
CBZ’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GHC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
CBZ (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а -8.89% price change this week, while GHC (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was +0.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +0.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.76%.
CBZ is expected to report earnings on Jul 25, 2024.
GHC is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2024.
The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
CBZ | GHC | CBZ / GHC | |
Capitalization | 3.93B | 3.42B | 115% |
EBITDA | 223M | 665M | 34% |
Gain YTD | 14.028 | 3.310 | 424% |
P/E Ratio | 32.58 | 17.25 | 189% |
Revenue | 1.59B | 4.42B | 36% |
Total Cash | 8.09M | 867M | 1% |
Total Debt | 551M | 1.25B | 44% |
CBZ | GHC | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 70 | 57 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 91 Overvalued | 25 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 2 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 57 | 84 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 29 | 96 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
GHC's Valuation (25) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for CBZ (91) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that GHC’s stock grew significantly faster than CBZ’s over the last 12 months.
CBZ's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for GHC (80) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CBZ’s stock grew significantly faster than GHC’s over the last 12 months.
CBZ's SMR Rating (57) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GHC (84) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CBZ’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.
CBZ's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as GHC (53) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CBZ’s stock grew similarly to GHC’s over the last 12 months.
CBZ's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for GHC (96) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that CBZ’s stock grew significantly faster than GHC’s over the last 12 months.
CBZ | GHC | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago58% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | 2 days ago57% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago47% | 2 days ago45% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago35% | 2 days ago58% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago42% | 2 days ago57% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago36% | 2 days ago49% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago68% | 14 days ago54% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago43% | 3 days ago49% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago59% | 2 days ago38% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago40% | 2 days ago56% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
CNWGX | 17.61 | -0.02 | -0.11% |
Calamos Evolving World Growth A | |||
CLBFX | 32.58 | -0.07 | -0.21% |
American Funds American Balanced 529F | |||
OSGCX | 9.24 | -0.02 | -0.22% |
JPMorgan Small Cap Growth C | |||
HRLAX | 8.77 | -0.04 | -0.45% |
Hartford Real Asset A | |||
FLSCX | 35.64 | -0.23 | -0.64% |
Fidelity Advisor Leveraged Co Stk C |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBZ has been loosely correlated with EXPO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBZ jumps, then EXPO could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CBZ | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
CBZ | 100% | +0.27% | ||
EXPO - CBZ | 59% Loosely correlated | -0.07% | ||
CTAS - CBZ | 58% Loosely correlated | +0.80% | ||
AZZ - CBZ | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
MMS - CBZ | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.57% | ||
GHC - CBZ | 47% Loosely correlated | +2.36% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GHC has been loosely correlated with RGP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GHC jumps, then RGP could also see price increases.