Ad is loading...
CCATX vs FRQAX
CCATX vs FRQAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCATX vs. FRQAX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCATX is a Hold and FRQAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CCATX has more cash in the bank: 3.8B vs. FRQAX (5.91M). FRQAX pays higher dividends than CCATX: FRQAX (2.68) vs CCATX (2.09). CCATX was incepted earlier than FRQAX: CCATX (11 years) vs FRQAX (18 years). CCATX (1.37) is less costly to investors than FRQAX (0.70). FRQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. CCATX (8.00). FRQAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CCATX: FRQAX (0) vs CCATX (250). FRQAX (7.81) and CCATX (7.53) have marching annual gain over last year. CCATX return over 5 years is better than : 18.95 vs. FRQAX (9.59).
| CCATX | FRQAX | CCATX / FRQAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.70 | 196% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.37 | 0.70 | 196% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.620 | 2.706 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.8B | 5.91M | 64,282% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.09 | 2.68 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.53 | 7.81 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.34 | 8.47 | 110% |
| Returns for 5 years | 18.95 | 9.59 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.37 | 3.03 | 737% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...