Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CCAZX vs FKTQX
CCAZX vs FKTQX Comparison
Open Charts CCAZX vs FKTQX
Columbia Strat CA Muncpl Inc Inst
Price$25.74
Change+$0.06 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets307.45M
Franklin CA Tax Free Income R6
Price$6.54
Change+$0.01 (+0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.41B
CCAZX vs FKTQX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CCAZX vs. FKTQX commentary
May 24, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CCAZX is a Hold and FKTQX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FKTQX has more cash in the bank: 12.4B vs. CCAZX (307M). FKTQX (3.87) and CCAZX (3.82) have matching dividends . CCAZX was incepted earlier than FKTQX: CCAZX (20 years) vs FKTQX (8 years). CCAZX (0.59) is less costly to investors than FKTQX (0.48). CCAZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 22.00 vs. FKTQX (7.96). CCAZX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKTQX: CCAZX (2000) vs FKTQX (1000000). CCAZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.58 vs. FKTQX (0.31). CCAZX return over 5 years is better than : -0.10 vs. FKTQX (-2.74).
| CCAZX | FKTQX | CCAZX / FKTQX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.48 | 113% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.59 | 0.48 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 20 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.799 | -2.585 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 307M | 12.4B | 2% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.82 | 3.87 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.58 | 0.31 | 185% |
| Returns for 3 years | 7.71 | 5.28 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | -0.10 | -2.74 | 4% |
| Returns for 10 years | 13.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement